From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757228Ab2EHDQE (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 23:16:04 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([150.101.121.179]:42036 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752941Ab2EHDP7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 23:15:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1336446956.2097.16.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH]: In kernel hibernation, suspend to both: draft From: Bojan Smojver To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 13:15:56 +1000 In-Reply-To: <201205072214.13912.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1336379825.2097.5.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <201205072214.13912.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 22:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Looks reasonable at first sight. OK, thanks for having a look! I'll check to see whether memory for hibernation is been released properly and then I may submit this for real. BTW, the patch actually worked on my ThinkPad T510. The miracles never stop. :-) Just to be sure - I should prepare a patch against your linux-next branch, correct? This patch was against mainline, which is still somewhat behind. -- Bojan