From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com>
Cc: "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"'David Rientjes'" <rientjes@google.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sched: Make nr_uninterruptible count a signed value
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 00:29:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336516174.8226.59.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336516020.8226.57.camel@twins>
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 00:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:14 -0700, Diwakar Tundlam wrote:
> > Sorry to bug you when it is late for you..
> >
> Nah, I'm the idiot still behind the screen after midnight, its just the
> brain that's slightly slower and needs more hints.
>
> > You're right, there is no real difference at all.
> > Only cosmetic difference when you look at the output of
> > cat /proc/sched_debug.
>
> Not sure I see that.. the printf is still using %Ld (signed) so the
> output shouldn't matter regardless of if the variable is unsigned long
> or long.
> >
> > But I suddenly realized maybe the increment/decrement of
> > nr_interruptible is reversed.
> > Maybe that's the source of the problem: decrement in activate task and
> > increment in deactivate task !!
>
> No that's right. nr_uninterruptible counts the number of tasks in
> uninterruptible sleep, so deactivate_task puts a task to sleep, so we
> need to increment the number of sleeping tasks, activate_task wakes a
> task up so we need to decrement the number of sleeping tasks.
>
> I think the problem you're having is that we don't match the cpu where
> we inc and dec the counter, and that's fully on purpose since its rather
> expensive -- it would require atomics.
>
FWIW the way to properly read the sched_debug output is something like:
# grep nr_uninterruptible /proc/sched_debug
.nr_uninterruptible : -1305
.nr_uninterruptible : 336
.nr_uninterruptible : -229
.nr_uninterruptible : 276
.nr_uninterruptible : 105
.nr_uninterruptible : 157
.nr_uninterruptible : -2782
.nr_uninterruptible : 325
.nr_uninterruptible : -471
.nr_uninterruptible : 9
.nr_uninterruptible : 205
.nr_uninterruptible : 88
.nr_uninterruptible : 7
.nr_uninterruptible : 912
.nr_uninterruptible : 188
.nr_uninterruptible : 66
.nr_uninterruptible : 87
.nr_uninterruptible : 45
.nr_uninterruptible : 194
.nr_uninterruptible : 1178
.nr_uninterruptible : 185
.nr_uninterruptible : 143
.nr_uninterruptible : 136
.nr_uninterruptible : 145
# awk '/nr_uninterruptible/ {t += $3} END {print t}' /proc/sched_debug
0
The per-cpu value is meaningless, only the sum over all cpus is a
meaningful number.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-08 21:39 [PATCH] sched: Make nr_uninterruptible count a signed value Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-08 21:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 22:14 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-08 22:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-08 22:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-05-08 22:46 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-09 7:49 ` Michael Wang
2012-05-09 18:55 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-10 4:46 ` Michael Wang
2012-05-09 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-09 19:04 ` Diwakar Tundlam
2012-05-10 3:41 ` Michael Wang
2012-05-10 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-11 2:19 ` Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1336516174.8226.59.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dtundlam@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox