From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934066AbXCTUWr (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:22:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934067AbXCTUWr (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:22:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54384 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934066AbXCTUWq (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:22:46 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20070320211405.3e1d2305@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20070320211405.3e1d2305@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070320195856.12853.63473.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Alan Cox Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert.xu@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #3] X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:22:25 +0000 Message-ID: <13367.1174422145@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > Some of them don't seem to be making it through to the list and are > dropped each time btw Yeah. It's a size issue. The fifth patch is a third of a megabyte. The patches at the URLs should now be updated (I'd forgotten to do that before sending the emails). David