From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757365Ab2EOLQu (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 07:16:50 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:47878 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756893Ab2EOLQt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 07:16:49 -0400 Message-ID: <1337080582.27694.40.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] x86/flush_tlb: try flush_tlb_single one by one in flush_tlb_range From: Peter Zijlstra To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Alex Shi , rob@landley.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jeremy@goop.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, riel@redhat.com, luto@mit.edu, avi@redhat.com, len.brown@intel.com, dhowells@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, cpw@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, rientjes@google.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, trenn@suse.de, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:16:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120515103307.GB27153@aftab.osrc.amd.com> References: <1336626013-28413-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1336626013-28413-4-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <20120510084213.GD30055@aftab.osrc.amd.com> <4FAB84B6.7060706@intel.com> <4FAE18D0.6050001@intel.com> <20120513111328.GD28863@aftab.osrc.amd.com> <4FB1AC03.2070407@intel.com> <20120515103307.GB27153@aftab.osrc.amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:33 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:06:11AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > > Thanks for your input. but actually, total 3 labels doesn't looks > > good. Maybe the following lines can meet your expectation. > > Yeah, a bit better. Wouldn't all this become much prettier if you rip out that multi-vector stuff?