From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762639Ab2ERKAp (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2012 06:00:45 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:54209 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762581Ab2ERKAn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2012 06:00:43 -0400 Message-ID: <1337335233.573.6.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent event facilities From: Peter Zijlstra To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Borislav Petkov Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:00:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1332340496-21658-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> References: <1332340496-21658-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <1332340496-21658-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:34 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > @@ -6319,6 +6332,10 @@ __perf_event_exit_task(struct perf_event *child_event, > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&child_ctx->lock); > } > > + /* do not remove persistent events on task exit */ > + if (child_event->attr.persistent) > + return; > + > perf_remove_from_context(child_event); > Huh, the task it dying, why would you let the event stay in the task context?