* [RFC][BUG] Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler"
@ 2012-05-21 8:06 Jiri Olsa
2012-05-22 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2012-05-21 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme, a.p.zijlstra, mingo, paulus, cjashfor, fweisbec
Cc: linux-kernel, eranian
hi,
Arnaldo an I were hunting why test__PERF_RECORD stop work recently.
It seems that following commit is the culprit:
sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler
commit cb04ff9ac424d0e689d9b612e9f73cb443ab4b7e
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Tue May 8 18:56:04 2012 +0200
the reason seems to be following:
- before commit this change was introduced, the process switch worked
like this (wrt to perf event schedule):
schedule (prev, next)
- schedule out all perf events for prev
- switch to next
- schedule in all perf events for current (next)
- after the commit, the process switch looks like:
schedule (prev, next)
- schedule out all perf events for prev
- schedule in all perf events for (next)
- switch to next
The problem is, that after we schedule perf events in, the pmu is
enabled and we can receive events even before we make the switch
to next - so "current" still being prev process (event SAMPLE data
are filled based on the value of the "current" process).
Thats exactly what we see for test__PERF_RECORD test. We receive
SAMPLES with PID of the process that our tracee is scheduled from.
Most of the time it's parent, sometimes idle (0).
I tried to keep the current code and add a new hook from finish_task_switch
to enable related PMUs for task.. but I'm getting following warning:
WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:1054 x86_pmu_start+0x133/0x140()
which I haven't figured out yet... also I'm not sure if thats even
right thing to do ;)
thoughts? thanks,
jirka
---
This reverts commit cb04ff9ac424d0e689d9b612e9f73cb443ab4b7e.
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/events/core.c | 14 ++++----------
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 8adf70e..f325786 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1084,8 +1084,10 @@ extern void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu);
extern int perf_num_counters(void);
extern const char *perf_pmu_name(void);
-extern void __perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *next);
+extern void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task);
+extern void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next);
extern int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child);
extern void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child);
extern void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task);
@@ -1205,13 +1207,20 @@ perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr)
extern struct static_key_deferred perf_sched_events;
-static inline void perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
+static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task)
{
+ if (static_key_false(&perf_sched_events.key))
+ __perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, task);
+}
+
+static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next)
+{
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, NULL, 0);
if (static_key_false(&perf_sched_events.key))
- __perf_event_task_sched(prev, task);
+ __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
}
extern void perf_event_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
@@ -1286,8 +1295,11 @@ extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_task_tick(void);
#else
static inline void
-perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *task) { }
+perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task) { }
+static inline void
+perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next) { }
static inline int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child) { return 0; }
static inline void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child) { }
static inline void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task) { }
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 91a4459..5b06cbb 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2039,8 +2039,8 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
* accessing the event control register. If a NMI hits, then it will
* not restart the event.
*/
-static void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
- struct task_struct *next)
+void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct task_struct *next)
{
int ctxn;
@@ -2279,8 +2279,8 @@ static void perf_branch_stack_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
* accessing the event control register. If a NMI hits, then it will
* keep the event running.
*/
-static void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *task)
+void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx;
int ctxn;
@@ -2305,12 +2305,6 @@ static void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
perf_branch_stack_sched_in(prev, task);
}
-void __perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
-{
- __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
- __perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, next);
-}
-
static u64 perf_calculate_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 nsec, u64 count)
{
u64 frequency = event->attr.sample_freq;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 18eed17..90c2427 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1913,7 +1913,7 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next)
{
sched_info_switch(prev, next);
- perf_event_task_sched(prev, next);
+ perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(prev, next);
prepare_lock_switch(rq, next);
prepare_arch_switch(next);
@@ -1956,6 +1956,13 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
*/
prev_state = prev->state;
finish_arch_switch(prev);
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+ local_irq_disable();
+#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */
+ perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, current);
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+ local_irq_enable();
+#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][BUG] Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler"
2012-05-21 8:06 [RFC][BUG] Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler" Jiri Olsa
@ 2012-05-22 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 11:13 ` [PATCH] " Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2012-05-22 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa; +Cc: acme, mingo, paulus, cjashfor, fweisbec, linux-kernel, eranian
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:06 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> Arnaldo an I were hunting why test__PERF_RECORD stop work recently.
> It seems that following commit is the culprit:
>
> sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler
> commit cb04ff9ac424d0e689d9b612e9f73cb443ab4b7e
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Date: Tue May 8 18:56:04 2012 +0200
>
> the reason seems to be following:
>
> - before commit this change was introduced, the process switch worked
> like this (wrt to perf event schedule):
>
> schedule (prev, next)
> - schedule out all perf events for prev
> - switch to next
> - schedule in all perf events for current (next)
>
> - after the commit, the process switch looks like:
>
> schedule (prev, next)
> - schedule out all perf events for prev
> - schedule in all perf events for (next)
> - switch to next
>
> The problem is, that after we schedule perf events in, the pmu is
> enabled and we can receive events even before we make the switch
> to next - so "current" still being prev process (event SAMPLE data
> are filled based on the value of the "current" process).
>
> Thats exactly what we see for test__PERF_RECORD test. We receive
> SAMPLES with PID of the process that our tracee is scheduled from.
> Most of the time it's parent, sometimes idle (0).
>
> I tried to keep the current code and add a new hook from finish_task_switch
> to enable related PMUs for task.. but I'm getting following warning:
>
> WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:1054 x86_pmu_start+0x133/0x140()
>
> which I haven't figured out yet... also I'm not sure if thats even
> right thing to do ;)
>
> thoughts?
Bah!, yeah I guess reverting is the right thing for now. Sad though.
So by having the two hooks we have a black-spot between them where we
receive no events at all, this black-spot covers the hand-over of
current and we thus don't receive the 'wrong' events.
I rather liked we could do away with both that black-spot and clean up
the code a little, but apparently people rely on it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler"
2012-05-22 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2012-05-23 11:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-05-23 16:09 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2012-05-23 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, mingo
Cc: acme, paulus, cjashfor, fweisbec, linux-kernel, eranian
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:01:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:06 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
SNIP
>
> Bah!, yeah I guess reverting is the right thing for now. Sad though.
>
> So by having the two hooks we have a black-spot between them where we
> receive no events at all, this black-spot covers the hand-over of
> current and we thus don't receive the 'wrong' events.
>
> I rather liked we could do away with both that black-spot and clean up
> the code a little, but apparently people rely on it.
>
>
ok, resending as patch with updated changelog
thanks,
jirka
---
This reverts commit cb04ff9ac424d0e689d9b612e9f73cb443ab4b7e.
sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Tue May 8 18:56:04 2012 +0200
Before commit this change was introduced, the process switch worked
like this (wrt to perf event schedule):
schedule (prev, next)
- schedule out all perf events for prev
- switch to next
- schedule in all perf events for current (next)
After the commit, the process switch looks like:
schedule (prev, next)
- schedule out all perf events for prev
- schedule in all perf events for (next)
- switch to next
The problem is, that after we schedule perf events in, the pmu is
enabled and we can receive events even before we make the switch
to next - so "current" still being prev process (event SAMPLE data
are filled based on the value of the "current" process).
Thats exactly what we see for test__PERF_RECORD test. We receive
SAMPLES with PID of the process that our tracee is scheduled from.
Discussed with Peter Zijlstra:
> Bah!, yeah I guess reverting is the right thing for now. Sad though.
>
> So by having the two hooks we have a black-spot between them where we
> receive no events at all, this black-spot covers the hand-over of
> current and we thus don't receive the 'wrong' events.
>
> I rather liked we could do away with both that black-spot and clean up
> the code a little, but apparently people rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/events/core.c | 14 ++++----------
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 8adf70e..f325786 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1084,8 +1084,10 @@ extern void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu);
extern int perf_num_counters(void);
extern const char *perf_pmu_name(void);
-extern void __perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *next);
+extern void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task);
+extern void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next);
extern int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child);
extern void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child);
extern void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task);
@@ -1205,13 +1207,20 @@ perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr)
extern struct static_key_deferred perf_sched_events;
-static inline void perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
+static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task)
{
+ if (static_key_false(&perf_sched_events.key))
+ __perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, task);
+}
+
+static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next)
+{
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, NULL, 0);
if (static_key_false(&perf_sched_events.key))
- __perf_event_task_sched(prev, task);
+ __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
}
extern void perf_event_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
@@ -1286,8 +1295,11 @@ extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_task_tick(void);
#else
static inline void
-perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *task) { }
+perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task) { }
+static inline void
+perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next) { }
static inline int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child) { return 0; }
static inline void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child) { }
static inline void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task) { }
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 91a4459..5b06cbb 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2039,8 +2039,8 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
* accessing the event control register. If a NMI hits, then it will
* not restart the event.
*/
-static void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
- struct task_struct *next)
+void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct task_struct *next)
{
int ctxn;
@@ -2279,8 +2279,8 @@ static void perf_branch_stack_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
* accessing the event control register. If a NMI hits, then it will
* keep the event running.
*/
-static void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *task)
+void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx;
int ctxn;
@@ -2305,12 +2305,6 @@ static void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
perf_branch_stack_sched_in(prev, task);
}
-void __perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
-{
- __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
- __perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, next);
-}
-
static u64 perf_calculate_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 nsec, u64 count)
{
u64 frequency = event->attr.sample_freq;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 18eed17..90c2427 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1913,7 +1913,7 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next)
{
sched_info_switch(prev, next);
- perf_event_task_sched(prev, next);
+ perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(prev, next);
prepare_lock_switch(rq, next);
prepare_arch_switch(next);
@@ -1956,6 +1956,13 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
*/
prev_state = prev->state;
finish_arch_switch(prev);
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+ local_irq_disable();
+#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */
+ perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, current);
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+ local_irq_enable();
+#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
--
1.7.7.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [tip:perf/core] Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler"
2012-05-23 11:13 ` [PATCH] " Jiri Olsa
@ 2012-05-23 16:09 ` tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2012-05-23 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Jiri Olsa @ 2012-05-23 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, tglx, jolsa
Commit-ID: ab0cce560ef177bdc7a8f73e9962be9d829a7b2c
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ab0cce560ef177bdc7a8f73e9962be9d829a7b2c
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:13:02 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:40:51 +0200
Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler"
This reverts commit cb04ff9ac424 ("sched, perf: Use a single
callback into the scheduler").
Before this change was introduced, the process switch worked
like this (wrt. to perf event schedule):
schedule (prev, next)
- schedule out all perf events for prev
- switch to next
- schedule in all perf events for current (next)
After the commit, the process switch looks like:
schedule (prev, next)
- schedule out all perf events for prev
- schedule in all perf events for (next)
- switch to next
The problem is, that after we schedule perf events in, the pmu
is enabled and we can receive events even before we make the
switch to next - so "current" still being prev process (event
SAMPLE data are filled based on the value of the "current"
process).
Thats exactly what we see for test__PERF_RECORD test. We receive
SAMPLES with PID of the process that our tracee is scheduled
from.
Discussed with Peter Zijlstra:
> Bah!, yeah I guess reverting is the right thing for now. Sad
> though.
>
> So by having the two hooks we have a black-spot between them
> where we receive no events at all, this black-spot covers the
> hand-over of current and we thus don't receive the 'wrong'
> events.
>
> I rather liked we could do away with both that black-spot and
> clean up the code a little, but apparently people rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: acme@redhat.com
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: eranian@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120523111302.GC1638@m.brq.redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/events/core.c | 14 ++++----------
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 8adf70e..f325786 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1084,8 +1084,10 @@ extern void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu);
extern int perf_num_counters(void);
extern const char *perf_pmu_name(void);
-extern void __perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *next);
+extern void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task);
+extern void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next);
extern int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child);
extern void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child);
extern void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task);
@@ -1205,13 +1207,20 @@ perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr)
extern struct static_key_deferred perf_sched_events;
-static inline void perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
+static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task)
{
+ if (static_key_false(&perf_sched_events.key))
+ __perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, task);
+}
+
+static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next)
+{
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, NULL, 0);
if (static_key_false(&perf_sched_events.key))
- __perf_event_task_sched(prev, task);
+ __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
}
extern void perf_event_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
@@ -1286,8 +1295,11 @@ extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_task_tick(void);
#else
static inline void
-perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *task) { }
+perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task) { }
+static inline void
+perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *next) { }
static inline int perf_event_init_task(struct task_struct *child) { return 0; }
static inline void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child) { }
static inline void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task) { }
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 91a4459..5b06cbb 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2039,8 +2039,8 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
* accessing the event control register. If a NMI hits, then it will
* not restart the event.
*/
-static void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
- struct task_struct *next)
+void __perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct task_struct *next)
{
int ctxn;
@@ -2279,8 +2279,8 @@ static void perf_branch_stack_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
* accessing the event control register. If a NMI hits, then it will
* keep the event running.
*/
-static void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
- struct task_struct *task)
+void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx;
int ctxn;
@@ -2305,12 +2305,6 @@ static void __perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
perf_branch_stack_sched_in(prev, task);
}
-void __perf_event_task_sched(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
-{
- __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
- __perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, next);
-}
-
static u64 perf_calculate_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 nsec, u64 count)
{
u64 frequency = event->attr.sample_freq;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 13c3883..0533a68 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1913,7 +1913,7 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next)
{
sched_info_switch(prev, next);
- perf_event_task_sched(prev, next);
+ perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(prev, next);
prepare_lock_switch(rq, next);
prepare_arch_switch(next);
@@ -1956,6 +1956,13 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
*/
prev_state = prev->state;
finish_arch_switch(prev);
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+ local_irq_disable();
+#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */
+ perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, current);
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+ local_irq_enable();
+#endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [tip:perf/core] Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler"
2012-05-23 16:09 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
@ 2012-05-23 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2012-05-23 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, hpa, linux-kernel, tglx, jolsa; +Cc: linux-tip-commits
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:09 -0700, tip-bot for Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > I rather liked we could do away with both that black-spot and
> > clean up the code a little, but apparently people rely on it.
>
Ingo noted that inherited counters already are active over the context
switch (due to the lazy switch optimization) and thus profile the
context switch cost.
Regular per-task counters not including this are therefore not
consistent.
So it would be good to find a way to fix the tracing fallout
differently. A well..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-23 16:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-21 8:06 [RFC][BUG] Revert "sched, perf: Use a single callback into the scheduler" Jiri Olsa
2012-05-22 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-23 11:13 ` [PATCH] " Jiri Olsa
2012-05-23 16:09 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2012-05-23 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox