From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755994Ab0G0JQI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:16:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59323 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754044Ab0G0JQE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:16:04 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20100727091320.GA26235@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <20100727091320.GA26235@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20100726204312.GB18853@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20100726203814.GA18828@merkur.ravnborg.org> <13144.1280221225@redhat.com> To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Michal Marek , linux-kbuild , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] frv: remove useless ARCHMODFLAGS assignment Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:15:55 +0100 Message-ID: <13381.1280222155@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sam Ravnborg wrote: > We could change it to: > -ARCHMODFLAGS += -G0 -mlong-calls > +KBUILD_MODFLAGS += -G0 -mlong-calls > > Would this be better? Probably. Thanks, David