From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] uprobes: install_breakpoint() should fail if is_swbp_insn() == T
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:21:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338402061.28384.22.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120530180409.GO15587@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 23:34 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Nit: {,un}egister_uprobe should have been uprobe_{,un}register at
> couple of places.
Ah indeed.. very silly.. hopefully last version.
---
Subject: uprobe: Document uprobe_register() vs uprobe_mmap() race
Because the mind is treacherous and makes us forget we need to write
stuff down.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 985be4d..fd6fb30 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -45,6 +45,23 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uprobes_treelock); /* serialize rbtree access */
#define UPROBES_HASH_SZ 13
+/*
+ * We need separate register/unregister and mmap/munmap lock hashes because of
+ * mmap_sem nesting.
+ *
+ * uprobe_register() needs to install probes on (potentially) all processes
+ * and thus needs to acquire multiple mmap_sems (consequtively, not
+ * concurrently), whereas uprobe_mmap() is called while holding mmap_sem
+ * for the particular process doing the mmap.
+ *
+ * uprobe_register()->register_for_each_vma() needs to drop/acquire mmap_sem
+ * because of lock order against i_mmap_mutex. This means there's a hole in the
+ * register vma iteration where a mmap() can happen.
+ *
+ * Thus uprobe_register() can race with uprobe_mmap() and we can try and
+ * install a probe where one is already installed.
+ */
+
/* serialize (un)register */
static struct mutex uprobes_mutex[UPROBES_HASH_SZ];
@@ -356,6 +373,9 @@ int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
{
int result;
+ /*
+ * See the comment near uprobes_hash().
+ */
result = is_swbp_at_addr(mm, vaddr);
if (result == 1)
return -EEXIST;
@@ -870,6 +890,10 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
mmput(mm);
if (is_register) {
+ /*
+ * We can race against uprobe_mmap() see the comment
+ * near uprobe_hash().
+ */
if (ret && ret == -EEXIST)
ret = 0;
if (ret)
@@ -1080,7 +1104,10 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
ret = install_breakpoint(uprobe, vma->vm_mm, vma, vaddr);
- /* Ignore double add: */
+ /*
+ * We can race against uprobe_register(), see the
+ * comment near uprobe_hash().
+ */
if (ret == -EEXIST) {
ret = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 16:57 [PATCH 0/3] uprobes: misc minor changes Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] uprobes: install_breakpoint() should fail if is_swbp_insn() == T Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 17:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 17:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 17:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 18:04 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 18:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-05-31 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-01 15:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-01 16:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-01 17:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-01 18:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-02 18:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-01 16:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-01 18:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-31 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 12:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] uprobes: remove the unnecessary initialization in add_utask() Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] uprobes: simplify the usage of uprobe->pending_list Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 17:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 18:23 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338402061.28384.22.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox