From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to flexible proportions
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:13:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338545638.28384.137.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120531224206.GC19050@quack.suse.cz>
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 00:42 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 01-06-12 00:26:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 00:11 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
> > > {
> > > - u64 events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> > > + u64 events;
> > > + unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > > + events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> > > + local_irq_restore(flags);
> > > /*
> > > * Don't do anything if there are no events.
> > > */
> > > @@ -73,7 +77,9 @@ bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
> > > if (periods < 64)
> > > events -= events >> periods;
> > > /* Use addition to avoid losing events happening between sum and set */
> > > + local_irq_save(flags);
> > > percpu_counter_add(&p->events, -events);
> > > + local_irq_restore(flags);
> > > p->period += periods;
> > > write_seqcount_end(&p->sequence);
> >
> > Uhm, why bother enabling it in between? Just wrap the whole function in
> > a single IRQ disable.
> I wanted to have interrupts disabled for as short as possible but if you
> think it doesn't matter, I'll take your advice. The result is attached.
Thing is, disabling interrupts is quite expensive and the extra few
instructions covered isn't much.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-01 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-24 16:59 [PATCH 0/2 v4] Flexible proportions Jan Kara
2012-05-24 16:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] lib: Proportions with flexible period Jan Kara
2012-05-24 16:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to flexible proportions Jan Kara
2012-05-28 15:49 ` Sasha Levin
2012-05-29 12:34 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-29 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-29 12:54 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-31 22:11 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-31 22:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 22:42 ` Jan Kara
2012-06-01 3:10 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-01 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-05-25 9:12 ` [PATCH 0/2 v4] Flexible proportions Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 9:29 ` Fengguang Wu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-15 15:43 [PATCH 0/2 v3] " Jan Kara
2012-05-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to flexible proportions Jan Kara
2012-05-17 22:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-18 14:24 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-18 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338545638.28384.137.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).