From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@linux.intel.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix intel shared extra msr allocation
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:39:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338899999.28282.164.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338898024.28282.160.camel@twins>
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:07 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 12:38 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > How about we add a field or flag to cpuc to tell it's fake, and then
> > in
> > try_alt_er() and __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints() we avoid
> > touching
> > live struct (like reg->alloc) if fake==1. I think he was trying to do
> > the same with the core_id == -1 test.
>
> We might have to do something like that, however I'm trying to figure
> out when that reg->alloc test in __intel_shared_reg_get_contraints() is
> useful.
>
> If it is useful in event scheduling, we cannot just leave it out in
> validate_group().
OK, so x86_schedule_events() can call that multiple times on the same
event in case we keep adding events.. it needs the constraints of the
previous events as well, and in that case we skip the whole extra_reg
muck.
But for validate_group() we only do this once, so it should work. Nasty
though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 3:20 [PATCH] perf: Fix intel shared extra msr allocation Yan, Zheng
2012-06-01 9:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-01 14:11 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-04 13:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 2:18 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-05 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 10:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 10:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-05 12:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:30 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Fix Intel shared extra MSR allocation Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 21:26 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-06 1:00 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-06 15:57 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:11 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:31 ` [PATCH] perf: Fix intel shared extra msr allocation Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-06 10:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-07 1:25 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-07 4:01 ` Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338899999.28282.164.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox