From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@linux.intel.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix intel shared extra msr allocation
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:04:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338901490.28282.167.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBRCMAnPH3UW0=afMw4-YXgwQ5D-NLMEtnNWde_Tzh3aew@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:51 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> So I think if you say in:
> __intel_shared_reg_put_constraints()
>
> if (!cpuc->is_fake)
> reg->alloc = 1;
>
> That should do it given that:
>
> __intel_shared_reg_put_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
> struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg)
> {
> struct er_account *era;
> if (!reg->alloc)
> return;
>
> }
>
> But then, if reg->alloc was already set to 1, you will have a problem
> if you leave
> it as is. So I think in __intel_shared_reg_put_constraints(), you still need:
>
> __intel_shared_reg_put_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
> struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg)
> {
> if (!reg->alloc || cpuc->is_fake)
> return;
>
> Or something like that.
Right, and then something slightly less hideous for intel_try_alt_er().
How does something like this look?
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 166546e..a3b7eb3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1119,27 +1119,33 @@ intel_bts_constraints(struct perf_event *event)
return NULL;
}
-static bool intel_try_alt_er(struct perf_event *event, int orig_idx)
+static int intel_alt_er(int idx)
{
if (!(x86_pmu.er_flags & ERF_HAS_RSP_1))
- return false;
+ return idx;
- if (event->hw.extra_reg.idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0) {
+ if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0)
+ return EXTRA_REG_RSP_1;
+
+ if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1)
+ return EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
+
+ return idx;
+}
+
+static void intel_fixup_er(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
+{
+ if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0) {
event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
event->hw.config |= 0x01bb;
event->hw.extra_reg.idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_1;
event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1;
- } else if (event->hw.extra_reg.idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1) {
+ } else if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1) {
event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
event->hw.config |= 0x01b7;
event->hw.extra_reg.idx = EXTRA_REG_RSP_0;
event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0;
}
-
- if (event->hw.extra_reg.idx == orig_idx)
- return false;
-
- return true;
}
/*
@@ -1157,14 +1163,14 @@ __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
struct event_constraint *c = &emptyconstraint;
struct er_account *era;
unsigned long flags;
- int orig_idx = reg->idx;
+ int idx = reg->idx;
/* already allocated shared msr */
if (reg->alloc)
return NULL; /* call x86_get_event_constraint() */
again:
- era = &cpuc->shared_regs->regs[reg->idx];
+ era = &cpuc->shared_regs->regs[idx];
/*
* we use spin_lock_irqsave() to avoid lockdep issues when
* passing a fake cpuc
@@ -1181,16 +1187,23 @@ __intel_shared_reg_get_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
atomic_inc(&era->ref);
/* no need to reallocate during incremental event scheduling */
- reg->alloc = 1;
+ if (!cpuc->is_fake) {
+ if (idx != reg->idx)
+ intel_fixup_er(event, idx);
+ reg->alloc = 1;
+ }
/*
* need to call x86_get_event_constraint()
* to check if associated event has constraints
*/
c = NULL;
- } else if (intel_try_alt_er(event, orig_idx)) {
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&era->lock, flags);
- goto again;
+ } else {
+ idx = intel_alt_er(idx);
+ if (idx != reg->idx) {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&era->lock, flags);
+ goto again;
+ }
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&era->lock, flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 3:20 [PATCH] perf: Fix intel shared extra msr allocation Yan, Zheng
2012-06-01 9:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-01 14:11 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-04 13:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 2:18 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-05 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 10:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 10:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 12:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-05 13:30 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Fix Intel shared extra MSR allocation Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 21:26 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-06 1:00 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-06 15:57 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:11 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:31 ` [PATCH] perf: Fix intel shared extra msr allocation Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-05 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 13:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-06 10:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-07 1:25 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-06-07 4:01 ` Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338901490.28282.167.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox