From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753831Ab2FEQBG (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:01:06 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:48532 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753473Ab2FEQBF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:01:05 -0400 Message-ID: <1338912052.2749.2.camel@twins> Subject: Re: git bisect and perf From: Peter Zijlstra To: David Ahern Cc: Ingo Molnar , Stephane Eranian , LKML , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:00:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4FCE25C6.2080601@gmail.com> References: <4FCE25C6.2080601@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 09:29 -0600, David Ahern wrote: > I am trying find out when (ie. which commit) the pebs feature > actually > started working on a westmere system What do you mean with working? The whole cycles:pp thing is magic and unrelated to 'regular' PEBS stuff. .35 would indeed be the version we introduced PEBS support and it should actually work. But if you're looking for the cycles:pp stuff (commit 7639dae0ca1) that's .38-rc1-ish.