From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eranian@google.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Don't assume there can be only 4 PEBS events
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:56:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338944211-28275-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338944211-28275-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
On Sandy Bridge in non HT mode there are 8 counters available. Since every
counter can write a PEBS record assuming there are 4 max is incorrect. Use
the reported counter number -- with an upper limit for a static array -- instead.
Also I made the warning messages a bit more informational.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index cdddcef..43cfed2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct amd_nb {
};
/* The maximal number of PEBS events: */
-#define MAX_PEBS_EVENTS 4
+#define MAX_PEBS_EVENTS 8
/*
* A debug store configuration.
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
int pebs_record_size;
void (*drain_pebs)(struct pt_regs *regs);
struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints;
+ int max_pebs_events;
/*
* Intel LBR
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 2e40391..71b8de5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1732,6 +1732,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.events_maskl = ebx.full;
x86_pmu.events_mask_len = eax.split.mask_length;
+ x86_pmu.max_pebs_events = min_t(unsigned, MAX_PEBS_EVENTS, x86_pmu.num_counters);
+
/*
* Quirk: v2 perfmon does not report fixed-purpose events, so
* assume at least 3 events:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 5a3edc2..0042942 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs)
* Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
* set a reset value.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(n > 1);
+ WARN_ONCE(n > 1, "bad leftover pebs %d\n", n);
at += n - 1;
__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, at);
@@ -658,10 +658,10 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
* Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
* set a reset value.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(n > MAX_PEBS_EVENTS);
+ WARN_ONCE(n > x86_pmu.max_pebs_events, "Unexpected number of pebs records %d\n", n);
for ( ; at < top; at++) {
- for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&at->status, MAX_PEBS_EVENTS) {
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&at->status, x86_pmu.max_pebs_events) {
event = cpuc->events[bit];
if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
continue;
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
break;
}
- if (!event || bit >= MAX_PEBS_EVENTS)
+ if (!event || bit >= x86_pmu.max_pebs_events)
continue;
__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, at);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-06 0:56 [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2012-06-06 15:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Don't assume there can be only 4 PEBS events Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:10 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 17:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:17 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Don' t " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Check LBR format capability Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 4:29 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:14 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add rdpmcl() Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 16:16 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Prefer RDPMC over RDMSR for reading counters Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:16 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-06 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:12 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:23 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:35 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:49 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:08 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 17:48 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338944211-28275-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox