From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755858Ab2FFKq2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:46:28 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:33305 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752833Ab2FFKq1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1338979579.2749.95.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Prefer RDPMC over RDMSR for reading counters From: Peter Zijlstra To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com, Andi Kleen Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:46:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1338944211-28275-5-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> References: <1338944211-28275-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1338944211-28275-5-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:56 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > > RDPMC is much faster than RDMSR for reading performance counters, > since it's not serializing. Use it if possible in the perf handler. > > Only tested on Sandy Bridge, so I only enabled it there so far. That's just stupid.. I took Vince's patch from a while back.