From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Prefer RDPMC over RDMSR for reading counters
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:45:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338993900.2749.127.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120606144132.GJ28225@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 07:41 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The reason I avoided it on everyone is that some old chips (NetBurst'ish
> I think) only were able to read the low 32bits through RDPMC.
Can you verify that? Surely Intel still has one of those space heaters
laying about. If so we need to make the P4 driver do something else.
> Ok. I wasn't aware of that. But it's not merged, what happened to ti?
I forgot about it and queued it instead of your patch, so it should be
'out' there soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-06 0:56 [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Don't assume there can be only 4 PEBS events Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:10 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 17:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:17 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Don' t " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Check LBR format capability Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 4:29 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:14 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Add rdpmcl() Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 16:16 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 0:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Prefer RDPMC over RDMSR for reading counters Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:16 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-06 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-06 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:12 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:23 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:35 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:49 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 16:08 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 17:48 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338993900.2749.127.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox