Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural

Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06T14:28:38Z

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 07:23 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> But it's very clear this cannot be done without a model check.
> I don't understand how you can even argue against that.

Who said I fixed it without a model check?

But simply disabling it for a model isn't how you do things.