From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
ming.m.lin@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 2/2] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:03:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339030997.7404.18.camel@yhuang-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206061552.47395.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 15:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 05, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 01:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, June 01, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, May 31, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 23:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 22, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Friday, May 18, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
[snip]
> > > > > Besides, this hunk of the $subject patch:
> > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -731,8 +791,8 @@ int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *
> > > > > > int error;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* bound the state we're entering */
> > > > > > - if (state > PCI_D3hot)
> > > > > > - state = PCI_D3hot;
> > > > > > + if (state > PCI_D3cold)
> > > > > > + state = PCI_D3cold;
> > > > > > else if (state < PCI_D0)
> > > > > > state = PCI_D0;
> > > > > > else if ((state == PCI_D1 || state == PCI_D2) && pci_no_d1d2(dev))
> > > > > > @@ -747,10 +807,15 @@ int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* This device is quirked not to be put into D3, so
> > > > > > don't put it in D3 */
> > > > > > - if (state == PCI_D3hot && (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3))
> > > > > > + if (state >= PCI_D3hot && (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3))
> > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - error = pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, state);
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * To put device in D3cold, we put device into D3hot in native
> > > > > > + * way, then put device into D3cold with platform ops
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + error = pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, state > PCI_D3hot ?
> > > > > > + PCI_D3hot : state);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (!__pci_complete_power_transition(dev, state))
> > > > > > error = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > should be merged separately, because it will affect suspend/hibernation code
> > > > > paths. Namely, it will change the behavior in such a way that some devices
> > > > > put into D3hot previously will be put into D3cold now during system suspend.
> > > >
> > > > Yes. This patch enables both runtime D3cold and D3cold during system
> > > > suspend. How about separate this patch into the following patches?
> > > >
> > > > - Add d3cold disable logic, including flags: no_d3cold, d3cold_allowed,
> > > > runtime_d3cold, and disable runtime d3cold (because part of runtime
> > > > d3cold support will be enabled by system d3cold support).
> > > >
> > > > - system d3cold support for PCIe port
> > > >
> > > > - system d3cold support in PCI core
> > > >
> > > > - runtime d3cold support for PCIe port
> > > >
> > > > - runtime d3cold support in PCI core
> > >
> > > Sounds good in principle.
> >
> > Thought it again.
> >
> > If my understanding were correct, in most cases, The value to put
> > devices into D3cold during system suspend/hibernate may be questionable.
> > Because after Linux put the devices into lower power state, the
> > firmware may put devices into D3cold state before entering system
> > suspend state.
> >
> > So, I think maybe we can just constrain the target state to D3hot in
> > pci_set_power_state() if system suspend/hibernate is ongoing
> > (dev->runtime_d3cold is not set). That is something as follow:
> >
> > /* D3cold during system suspend/hibernate is not supported yet */
> > if (dev->runtime_d3cold && state >= PCI_D3cold)
> > state = PCI_D3cold;
> > else if (state > PCI_D3hot)
> > state = PCI_D3hot;
> >
> > This way, we can just make some minor change to this patch and maybe
> > work on D3cold during system suspend/hibernate after some discussion.
>
> I don't honestly think we should add such ugly checks to pci_set_power_state().
>
> Why don't we ensure that acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() doesn't return 4
> (D3cold) if acpi_target_sleep_state is different from 0 instead?
We can add that into acpi_target_sleep_state. But pci_set_power_sate()
is public API and used by many places already, do a quick search in
recent kernel source.
$ grep 'pci_set_power_state' -r . | grep -v PCI_D3hot | grep -v PCI_D0 | grep -v pci_choose_state | wc -l
yields:
55
$ grep 'pci_set_power_state' -r . | grep -v PCI_D3hot | grep -v PCI_D0 | grep -v pci_choose_state | grep -i d3cold
yields:
./drivers/misc/cb710/core.c: pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3cold);
./arch/x86/pci/mrst.c: pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D3cold);
Although we can check/fix them one by one. We need to prevent future
pci_set_power_state to accept PCI_D3cold in some situation.
So I think we need to constrain the parameter of pci_set_power_state
anyway. Maybe something like below in pci_set_power_state is better
than my previous one.
/* D3cold during system suspend/hibernate is not supported yet */
if (!dev->runtime_d3cold && state > PCI_D3hot)
state = PCI_D3hot;
if (state > PCI_D3cold)
state = PCI_D3cold;
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-18 1:48 [PATCH -v4 0/2] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support Huang Ying
2012-05-18 1:48 ` [PATCH -v4 1/2] PCIe: Add runtime PM support to PCIe port Huang Ying
2012-05-21 22:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-18 1:48 ` [PATCH -v4 2/2] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support Huang Ying
2012-05-21 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-30 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-31 0:40 ` Huang Ying
2012-05-31 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-01 2:03 ` Huang Ying
2012-06-01 2:25 ` Huang Ying
2012-06-01 23:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-05 5:24 ` Huang Ying
2012-06-06 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-07 1:03 ` Huang Ying [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339030997.7404.18.camel@yhuang-dev \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox