Re: [PATCH] fix usb skeleton driver

[Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>]

Am Mittwoch, den 06.06.2012, 16:22 -0400 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> 
> > The reason to fix the skeleton driver was about the complains for my
> > NRPZ driver, which was based on the design of the usb skeleton driver.
> > 
> > > Going even farther, I'm not so sure it's a good idea for usb-skeleton
> > > to try supporting both synchronous and asynchronous accesses.  This
> > > adds a layer of complexity that people just don't need.  IMO it would 
> > > be better to have two separate example drivers, an easy one that is 
> > > purely synchronous and a more advanced one that is purely async.
> > > 
> > 
> > Agree, i think this would be a good idea to have to separate drivers.
> > Both should be also working drivers, for really simple hardware.
> > 
> > The best way for me to do this is to shrink later this to a simplified
> > driver. 
> 
> That makes sense.  Will you do it?

Yes, if nobody other will do this.

> 
> > I think it is important to have a clean and working example. It would
> > save a lot of time for everybody and shrinks the number of round trips.
> 
> How can you tell that it works?  By testing your NRPZ driver?
> 

That is an option. But i will look for a more generic hardware. Maybe a
smartphone or a usb pen drive.