From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org, mingo@elte.hu,
ming.m.lin@intel.com,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: check ucode before disabling PEBS on SandyBridge
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339166718.2507.37.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120608143636.GG31359@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:36 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 04:20:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:15 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > have a variable which gets initialized to the number of all CPUs and
> > > each time ->apply_microcode() finishes by returning 0, we decrement it
> > > once.
> >
> > >
> > > Hmm, I'm probably missing some obscure case.
> >
> > Since its all per-cpu sysfs muck, userspace could update a random
> > subsets of cpus.. leaving us hanging.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand - when you modprobe microcode.ko,
> it goes and loads /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin (in
> the AMD case) on each CPU when the driver gets regged through
> subsys_interface_register().
>
> It calls ->add_dev() on each CPU - this should be guaranteed because it
> uses the cpu_subsys from drivers/base/cpu.c which onlines all CPUs, I'd
> assume.
>
> So, I'd say that once subsys_interface_register() returns, we have
> updated ucode on all CPUs, if successful...
>
> We probably could run the notifier at that moment, before we do
> put_online_cpus().
I was thinking about reload_store(), that seems to only reload ucode for
a single cpu.
> > The 'bestestet' idea I came up with is doing the verify thing I have
> > from a delayed work -- say 1 second into the future. That way, when
> > there's lots of cpus they all try and enqueue the one work, which at
> > the end executes only once, provided the entire update scan took less
> > than the second.
>
> You're saying, you want the last CPU that gets to update its microcode
> gets to also run the delayed work...? Probably, I'd assume ucode update
> on a single CPU takes less than a second IIUC.
Nah.. it'll probably be the first. But it doesn't matter which cpu does
it. So the idea was:
static void intel_snb_verify_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
/* do the verify thing.. */
}
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(intel_snb_delayed_work, intel_snb_verify_ucode);
static int intel_snb_ucode_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long action, void *_uci)
{
/*
* Since ucode cannot be down-graded, and no future ucode revision
* is known to break PEBS again, we're ok with MICROCODE_CAN_UPDATE.
*/
if (action == MICROCODE_UPDATED)
schedule_delayed_work(&intel_snb_delayed_work, HZ);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
Thus it will queue the delayed work when the work isn't already queued
for execution. Resulting in the work only happening once a second (at
most).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-07 7:15 [PATCH] perf/x86: check ucode before disabling PEBS on SandyBridge Stephane Eranian
2012-06-07 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07 10:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-07 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07 10:48 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-07 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-08 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 10:03 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-08 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 13:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-08 15:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:03 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-08 14:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 16:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-08 21:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-08 21:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 14:07 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-08 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:26 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-08 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:26 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-12 8:14 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-08 16:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-08 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 16:50 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-08 18:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-08 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 20:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 17:07 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-12 17:09 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-12 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12 17:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12 17:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12 18:04 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-12 20:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-13 1:04 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-13 6:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-13 12:36 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-13 16:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-13 21:41 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-15 12:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-15 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-15 12:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-15 16:52 ` [PATCH] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system Borislav Petkov
2012-06-15 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-15 17:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-19 2:46 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-19 3:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-19 5:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-19 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 10:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-19 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-19 15:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-19 18:22 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-19 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-20 23:46 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-20 23:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-21 0:06 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-21 0:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-21 2:33 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-19 5:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-19 18:57 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-19 22:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-19 2:42 ` [PATCH] perf/x86: check ucode before disabling PEBS on SandyBridge Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-12 17:23 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-12 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-07 13:28 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-07 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-12 18:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-12 19:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12 19:35 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-12 19:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 20:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-12 20:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-12 20:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-12 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-12 21:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-13 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 14:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-13 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 15:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-13 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 13:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-13 14:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-13 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 13:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-13 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 15:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-12 20:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339166718.2507.37.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox