From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Cc: "'Charles Wang'" <muming.wq@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"'Charles Wang'" <muming.wq@taobao.com>, "'Tao Ma'" <tm@tao.ma>,
'含黛' <handai.szj@taobao.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:57:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339624653.8980.76.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000601cd4979$e1fda7a0$a5f8f6e0$@net>
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 08:33 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> All that being said, what I typically do with a new code test is:
>
> . select a known, previous bad operating point. For example 2
> processes, actual load average 0.30 (0.15 for each process) currently
> reporting ~1.5.
OK, I'll try and apply this. Waiting 63 hours for feedback on patches is
something I'm not patient enough for.
Would this be:
./waiter 2 900 230608 10000
I haven't even bothered reading the waiter proglet yet, but I did notice
the 'help' provided when started without arguments doesn't seem to
actually match what load_180 does.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-09 10:54 [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Charles Wang
2012-06-11 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <4FD6BFC4.1060302@gmail.com>
2012-06-12 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-12 9:34 ` Charles Wang
2012-06-12 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 5:55 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13 7:56 ` Charles Wang
2012-06-14 4:41 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-14 15:42 ` Charles Wang
2012-06-16 6:42 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 15:33 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-13 21:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-14 3:13 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-20 19:24 ` sched: care and feeding of load-avg code (Re: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate) Jonathan Nieder
2012-06-15 14:27 ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Charles Wang
2012-06-15 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-16 14:53 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 6:41 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-18 14:41 ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 10:06 ` Charles Wang
2012-06-18 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 6:08 ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-19 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 15:50 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-20 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-21 4:12 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-21 6:35 ` Charles Wang
2012-06-21 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-22 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-24 21:45 ` Doug Smythies
2012-07-03 16:01 ` Doug Smythies
2012-06-25 2:15 ` Charles Wang
2012-07-06 6:19 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-19 6:19 ` [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate Doug Smythies
2012-06-19 6:24 ` Charles Wang
2012-06-19 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339624653.8980.76.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muming.wq@gmail.com \
--cc=muming.wq@taobao.com \
--cc=tm@tao.ma \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox