public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] perf, x86: Add northbridge counter support for AMD family 15h
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:38:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340185084.21745.81.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120620092932.GH1478@erda.amd.com>

On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:29 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> Second, since nb perfctr are implemented the same way as core
> counters, the same code would have been used. Thus multiple (two) x86
> pmus (struct x86_pmu) would reside in parallel in the kernel. 

Well, no. The I take it the uncore counters are nb wide, thus you need
special goo to make counter rotation work properly, x86_pmu is unsuited
for that.



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19 18:10 [PATCH 00/10] perf, x86: Add northbridge counter support for AMD family 15h Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf, amd: Rework northbridge event constraints handler Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf, x86: Rework counter reservation code Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf, x86: Use bitmasks for generic counters Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf, x86: Rename Intel specific macros Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf, x86: Move Intel specific code to intel_pmu_init() Robert Richter
2012-06-20  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 14:22     ` Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf, amd: Unify AMD's generic and family 15h pmus Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf, amd: Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 15h Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf, amd: Enable northbridge counters on " Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists() Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf, amd: Check northbridge event config value Robert Richter
2012-06-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 00/10] perf, x86: Add northbridge counter support for AMD family 15h Stephane Eranian
2012-06-20  8:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found] ` <CABPqkBS9hRxKLsecVK+AgRue6oqTtAg4=0Dpd5Z2VwAUja50fw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-20  9:29   ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20  9:38     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-20 10:00       ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20 10:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 12:29           ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20 15:54             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 16:08               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 16:21               ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-20 10:46         ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-20 12:41           ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340185084.21745.81.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox