From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists()
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:53:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340380427.18025.84.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340217996-2254-5-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 20:46 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> It might be of interest which perfctr msr failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index bb340dc..8d29a35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static void release_pmc_hardware(void) {}
>
> static bool check_hw_exists(void)
> {
> - u64 val, val_new = 0;
> + u64 val, val_new = ~0;
> int i, reg, ret = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ bios_fail:
>
> msr_fail:
> printk(KERN_CONT "Broken PMU hardware detected, using software events only.\n");
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to access perfctr msr (MSR %x is %Lx)\n", reg, val_new);
>
> return false;
> }
My gcc wants me to add the below to avoid used uninitialized warns:
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -211,8 +211,9 @@ static bool check_hw_exists(void)
* that don't trap on the MSR access and always return 0s.
*/
val = 0xabcdUL;
- ret = wrmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), val);
- ret |= rdmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), &val_new);
+ reg = x86_pmu_event_addr(0);
+ ret = wrmsrl_safe(reg, val);
+ ret |= rdmsrl_safe(reg, &val_new);
if (ret || val != val_new)
goto msr_fail;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-22 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 18:46 [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: Updates and cleanups Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Rename Intel specific macros Robert Richter
2012-07-06 6:25 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: Move Intel specific code to intel_pmu_init() Robert Richter
2012-07-06 6:26 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf, amd: Unify AMD's generic and family 15h pmus Robert Richter
2012-07-06 6:26 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/amd: Unify AMD' s " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists() Robert Richter
2012-06-22 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-22 16:36 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-27 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-06 6:27 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists( ) tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 20:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: Updates and cleanups Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340380427.18025.84.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox