From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ubi: kill CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:06:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341389164-24409-4-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341389164-24409-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE and MIN_RESEVED_PEBS are no longer used,
since the amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling is now
derived from 'ubi->bad_peb_limit' (ubi's maximum expected bad
eraseblocks).
Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig | 1 -
drivers/mtd/ubi/Kconfig | 15 ---------------
drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h | 3 ---
3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig
index f6917c9..da276f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/sam9_l9260_defconfig
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ CONFIG_MTD_NAND=y
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ATMEL=y
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_PLATFORM=y
CONFIG_MTD_UBI=y
-CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE=3
CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT=3
CONFIG_MTD_UBI_GLUEBI=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/ubi/Kconfig
index 7eb91cb..145cda2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/Kconfig
@@ -27,21 +27,6 @@ config MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD
life-cycle less than 10000, the threshold should be lessened (e.g.,
to 128 or 256, although it does not have to be power of 2).
-config MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE
- int "Percentage of reserved eraseblocks for bad eraseblocks handling"
- default 1
- range 0 25
- help
- If the MTD device admits of bad eraseblocks (e.g. NAND flash), UBI
- reserves some amount of physical eraseblocks to handle new bad
- eraseblocks. For example, if a flash physical eraseblock becomes bad,
- UBI uses these reserved physical eraseblocks to relocate the bad one.
- This option specifies how many physical eraseblocks will be reserved
- for bad eraseblock handling (percents of total number of good flash
- eraseblocks). If the underlying flash does not admit of bad
- eraseblocks (e.g. NOR flash), this value is ignored and nothing is
- reserved. Leave the default value if unsure.
-
config MTD_UBI_BEB_LIMIT
int "Percentage of maximum expected bad eraseblocks"
default 2
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
index b5217ef..80c394eb 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
@@ -59,9 +59,6 @@
#define ubi_err(fmt, ...) printk(KERN_ERR "UBI error: %s: " fmt "\n", \
__func__, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-/* Lowest number PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling */
-#define MIN_RESEVED_PEBS 2
-
/* Background thread name pattern */
#define UBI_BGT_NAME_PATTERN "ubi_bgt%dd"
--
1.7.9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-04 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 8:05 [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 7:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 10:40 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-19 6:16 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-30 13:00 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-09 10:15 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09 11:02 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 10:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:01 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 19:55 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-19 3:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:40 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04 8:06 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] ubi: trivial: fix comment of ubi_calculate_reserved() Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 10:38 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] ubi: harmonize the update of ubi->beb_rsvd_pebs Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 11:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04 8:35 ` [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation Richard Weinberger
2012-07-04 11:33 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-06 15:27 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-07 6:14 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-07 8:32 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09 6:58 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-16 15:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-17 7:23 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 6:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-30 13:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-31 8:19 ` Shmulik Ladkani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1341389164-24409-4-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).