public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: add /proc/perf_events file for dump perf events info
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:54:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341496440.19870.69.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACV3sb+rixP3HZ2=dJoe7x+9Rc5amRKu7dyj_4mcaZajwH2MSA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 21:38 +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 21:02 +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> >> > Watch all perf events in system wide can be very useful for perf subsystem issue handling,
> >> > to know which perf event is active in system,
> >> > perf event is a resouce, it would like to be managed easily for user, with more visable, like /proc/timer, etc...
> >> >
> >> > .jovi
> >>
> >>
> >> Ping...
> >
> > Never saw your reply, due to HTML it landed in the spam folder.
> >
> > That's a pretty non-specific answer.. again, why are you interested,
> > what specific problem are you wanting to solve.
> >
> > I've never had this need myself.
> >
> sorry, I will try to explain more.
> 
> One problem I faced is about hw_breakpoint.
> As you known, hw_breakpoint use limit debug register in most architecture,
> In multi-user environment, sometime user cannot set hw_breakpoint because
> other user already occupy hw_breakpoint slots. currently, there don't
> have a way to know
> how many hw_breakpint perf event already is used in system, so that's
> why I thinking
> we might need a way to get perf event in systerm wide, with visable output.

Hrmm,. so this seems pretty specific to the horror of hw_breakpoint. And
yes those are unfortunate and weird.

But how would you use this proc file? Would you go read it
programmatically or just look at it as a user to figure out why stuff
doesn't work?

> Also this method is not only used for hw_breakpoint, others perf event
> might have similar problem,
> even other perf event don't have limit number, but it can make use of
> this /proc/perf_events

They have a limit alright, but we can round-robin them to hide this fact
(unless you tell it not to).

> Active perf events is cpu consumer at most time, at this point of
> view, system administrator also can use this
> /proc/perf_events to detect is there have any perf events is consuming cpu.

I doubt you can see which is consuming cycles, but you can see if
there's any in use.

> A method to detect perf event leak? of couse our perf subsystem is
> very stable right now, ingnore this :)

There's alway bugs ;-)

The problem I have with the patch is the global nature of it.. but if
something like this is require I guess I can live with it. But it might
be the current proposal is exposing too much information, I would
certainly not mark it readable for the entire world either.




  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-05 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-05  8:23 [PATCH] perf: add /proc/perf_events file for dump perf events info Jovi Zhang
2012-07-05  8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]   ` <CACV3sb+aadXJYu7_JUedCodgQmF8d1q7OxSVoz=vwfc+Ow_caA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-05 13:02     ` Jovi Zhang
2012-07-05 13:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-05 13:38         ` Jovi Zhang
2012-07-05 13:54           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-07-06  2:26             ` Jovi Zhang
2012-09-13 21:03       ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1341496440.19870.69.camel@laptop \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=bookjovi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox