From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: 3.4.4-rt13: btrfs + xfstests 006 = BOOM.. and a bonus rt_mutex deadlock report for absolutely free!
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:53:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342086792.7707.9.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342082648.7338.171.camel@marge.simpson.net>
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 07:47 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm chasing btrfs critters in an enterprise 3.0-rt kernel, and just
> > checked to see if they're alive in virgin latest/greatest rt kernel.
> >
> > Both are indeed alive and well, ie I didn't break it, nor did the
> > zillion patches in enterprise base kernel, so others may have an
> > opportunity to meet these critters up close and personal as well.
>
> 3.2-rt both explodes and deadlocks as well. 3.0-rt (virgin I mean) does
> neither, so with enough re-integrate investment, it might be bisectable.
Nope, virgin 3.0-rt just didn't feel like it at the time. Booted it
again to run hefty test over lunch, it didn't survive 1 xfstests 006,
much less hundreds.
crash> bt
PID: 7604 TASK: ffff880174238b20 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "btrfs-worker-0"
#0 [ffff88017455d9c8] machine_kexec at ffffffff81025794
#1 [ffff88017455da28] crash_kexec at ffffffff8109781d
#2 [ffff88017455daf8] panic at ffffffff814a0661
#3 [ffff88017455db78] __try_to_take_rt_mutex at ffffffff81086d2f
#4 [ffff88017455dbc8] rt_spin_lock_slowlock at ffffffff814a2670
#5 [ffff88017455dca8] rt_spin_lock at ffffffff814a2db9
#6 [ffff88017455dcb8] schedule_bio at ffffffff81243133
#7 [ffff88017455dcf8] btrfs_map_bio at ffffffff812477be
#8 [ffff88017455dd68] __btree_submit_bio_done at ffffffff812152f6
#9 [ffff88017455dd78] run_one_async_done at ffffffff812148fa
#10 [ffff88017455dd98] run_ordered_completions at ffffffff812493e8
#11 [ffff88017455ddd8] worker_loop at ffffffff81249dc9
#12 [ffff88017455de88] kthread at ffffffff81070266
#13 [ffff88017455df48] kernel_thread_helper at ffffffff814a9be4
crash> struct rt_mutex 0xffff880174530108
struct rt_mutex {
wait_lock = {
raw_lock = {
slock = 7966
}
},
wait_list = {
node_list = {
next = 0xffff880175ecc970,
prev = 0xffff880175ecc970
},
rawlock = 0xffff880175ecc968,
spinlock = 0x0
},
owner = 0x1,
save_state = 0,
file = 0x0,
name = 0xffffffff81763d02 "&(&device->io_lock)->lock",
line = 0,
magic = 0x0
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 5:47 3.4.4-rt13: btrfs + xfstests 006 = BOOM.. and a bonus rt_mutex deadlock report for absolutely free! Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 8:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 9:53 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2012-07-12 11:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 11:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 13:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 13:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 13:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 13:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 13:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-13 6:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-13 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 10:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-13 10:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 10:47 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-13 12:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-12 11:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-12 17:09 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-13 10:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-13 12:50 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-13 14:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-07-14 10:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-15 17:56 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-16 2:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 16:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-16 16:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 16:35 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-16 16:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 17:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-17 4:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-17 4:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-17 4:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-17 4:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-17 4:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-17 12:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 10:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16 15:43 ` Chris Mason
2012-07-16 16:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-14 13:38 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342086792.7707.9.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox