From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Cc: "Venkataraman, Meenakshi" <meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com>,
"Lin, Hsien KuoX" <hsien.kuox.lin@intel.com>,
"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ilw] Re: 3.4-rc2, ilwagn still most of the time completely unusable
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:16:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342109807.4531.38.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712081457.GA32465@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:14 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > I can actually work now wirelessly, and in case of hangs an rfkill block
> > rfkill unblock practically always, and mostly is not needed.
>
> Ok, that was said *UNTIL* I reenabled 11n. Up to now I was loading the
> iwlwifi module with
> 11n_disable=1
>
> Now, latest git from today, I though, let us try to enable 11n again,
> and there we go, boot from cold machine and after short time everything
> is dead without reaction. Dmesg gives many many funny messages:
>
> [ 30.047943] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
> [ 30.051933] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: Radio type=0x1-0x2-0x0
> [ 30.164836] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
> [ 30.167876] iwlwifi 0000:06:00.0: Radio type=0x1-0x2-0x0
> [ 37.533619] wlan0: authenticate with 00:0a:79:eb:56:10
> [ 37.536433] wlan0: send auth to 00:0a:79:eb:56:10 (try 1/3)
> [ 37.538241] wlan0: authenticated
> [ 37.538391] wlan0: associating with AP with corrupt beacon
That might be an indication of things already going wrong with your
AP ... :-(
[snip log]
Mostly from the log it seems that there's a lot of spurious aggregation
setup/teardown, some of it seems to originate from the AP.
> At that point I removed the iwlwifi module, and reloaded it with
> 11n_disable=1 again, otherwise nothing would work at all...
With the latest, I've extended 11n_disable to have more bits.
11n_disable=1 will disable HT completely
11n_disable=2 will disable TX aggregation
11n_disable=4 will disable RX aggregation
It'd be interesting to see what happens for you with 11n_disable=2/4/6.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-30 1:17 iwlagn (3.3-wl), the saga continuous Norbert Preining
2012-04-11 2:37 ` 3.4-rc2, ilwagn still most of the time completely unusable Norbert Preining
2012-04-11 2:54 ` David Miller
2012-04-11 18:40 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-11 20:01 ` Dave Jones
2012-04-11 23:01 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-11 23:24 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-04-12 0:02 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-13 1:32 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-04-13 1:40 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-13 5:38 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-25 1:06 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-04-26 0:51 ` Norbert Preining
2012-06-28 7:25 ` Norbert Preining
2012-06-28 7:51 ` [Ilw] " Johannes Berg
2012-06-28 8:16 ` Norbert Preining
2012-07-03 19:35 ` Alessandro Suardi
2012-07-12 8:14 ` Norbert Preining
2012-07-12 16:16 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-07-25 3:07 ` Norbert Preining
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342109807.4531.38.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=egrumbach@gmail.com \
--cc=hsien.kuox.lin@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com \
--cc=preining@logic.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox