From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:40:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342611620.7530.18.camel@brekeke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341389164-24409-3-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 477 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:06 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> The existing mechanism of reserving PEBs for bad PEB handling has two
> flaws:
> - It is calculated as a percentage of good PEBs instead of total PEBs.
> - There's no limit on the amount of PEBs UBI reserves for future bad
> eraseblock handling.
OK, I've modified this patch a lot, did not test, and sent what I have
in the beb branch to you - please, take a look.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 8:05 [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 7:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 10:40 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-19 6:16 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-30 13:00 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-09 10:15 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09 11:02 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 10:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:01 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 19:55 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-19 3:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:40 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] ubi: kill CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] ubi: trivial: fix comment of ubi_calculate_reserved() Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 10:38 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04 8:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] ubi: harmonize the update of ubi->beb_rsvd_pebs Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 11:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04 8:35 ` [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation Richard Weinberger
2012-07-04 11:33 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-06 15:27 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-07 6:14 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-07 8:32 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09 6:58 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-16 15:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-17 7:23 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 6:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-30 13:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-31 8:19 ` Shmulik Ladkani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342611620.7530.18.camel@brekeke \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).