From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755310Ab2GRVqn (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:46:43 -0400 Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.45]:14715 "EHLO g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168Ab2GRVqk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:46:40 -0400 Message-ID: <1342647716.3010.40.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_() interfaces From: Toshi Kani To: Joe Perches Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, liuj97@gmail.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:41:56 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1342646876.2215.6.camel@joe2Laptop> References: <1342644027-19559-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com> <1342644027-19559-2-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com> <1342646876.2215.6.camel@joe2Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-1.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:40 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > > This patch introduces acpi_pr_(), where is a message > > level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging messages > > for ACPI, esp. in hotplug operations. > > One more note: > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c > [] > > @@ -454,3 +454,35 @@ acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, > [] > > +void > > +acpi_printk(const char *level, acpi_handle handle, const char *fmt, ...) > [] > > + struct acpi_buffer buffer = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER}; > [] > > + ret = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer); > [] > > + kfree(buffer.pointer); > > There's a failure mode here because buffer.pointer > isn't guaranteed to be initialized or set to NULL. Hi Joe, Yes, I thought that check was necessary as well. However, to my surprise, such check caused the following warning message from patchcheck.pl. So, I deleted the check... # check for needless kfree() checks if ($prevline =~ /\bif\s*\(([^\)]*)\)/) { my $expr = $1; if ($line =~ /\bkfree\(\Q$expr\E\);/) { WARN("NEEDLESS_KFREE", "kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev); } } Thanks, -Toshi