From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754313Ab2GRWbL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:31:11 -0400 Received: from g1t0028.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.35]:47738 "EHLO g1t0028.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751611Ab2GRWbJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:31:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1342650386.3010.55.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_() interfaces From: Toshi Kani To: shuah.khan@hp.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, liuj97@gmail.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com, shuahkhan@gmail.com Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:26:26 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1342648771.5138.37.camel@lorien2> References: <1342644027-19559-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com> <1342644027-19559-2-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com> <1342648771.5138.37.camel@lorien2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-1.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 15:59 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:40 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > > This patch introduces acpi_pr_(), where is a message > > level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging messages > > for ACPI, esp. in hotplug operations. acpi_pr_() appends > > "ACPI" prefix and ACPI object path to the messages. This improves > > diagnostics in hotplug operations since it identifies an object that > > caused an issue in a log file. > > > > acpi_pr_() takes acpi_handle as an argument, which is passed > > to ACPI hotplug notify handlers from the ACPI CA. Therefore, it is > > always available unlike other kernel objects, such as device. > > > > For example, the statement below > > acpi_pr_err(handle, "Device don't exist, dropping EJECT\n"); > > logs an error message like this: > > ACPI: \_SB_.SCK4.CPU4: Device don't exist, dropping EJECT > > > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani > > --- > > drivers/acpi/utils.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c > > index 3e87c9c..4097266 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c > > @@ -454,3 +454,35 @@ acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, > > #endif > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost); > > + > > +/** > > + * acpi_printk: Print messages with ACPI prefix and object path > > + * > > + * This function is intended to be called through acpi_pr_ macros. > > + */ > > +void > > +acpi_printk(const char *level, acpi_handle handle, const char *fmt, ...) > > +{ > > + struct va_format vaf; > > + va_list args; > > + struct acpi_buffer buffer = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER}; > > + char *path; > > + acpi_status ret; > > + > > + va_start(args, fmt); > > + > > + vaf.fmt = fmt; > > + vaf.va = &args; > > + > > + ret = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer); > > One big problem I see with this approach is now each acpi_printk() will > result in a call to acpi_get_name() which will invoke several ACPI > calls, including a call to acpi_ut_initialize_buffer() which allocates > buffer. Is this really warranted? What is the performance impact of this > change? Hi Shuah, This interface is intended to be used by acpi_pr_(), which is used for error, warning, debugging, etc. It is not intended to be used in any performance path. Thanks, -Toshi > > -- Shuah > >