From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753651Ab2GTM6x (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:58:53 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:49121 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753522Ab2GTM6v convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:58:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1342789099.2583.1.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa: recovered SD_PERFER_SIBLING on CPU domain From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alex Shi Cc: tj@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:58:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1342765190-21540-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> References: <1342765190-21540-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 14:19 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > commit 8e7fbcbc22c(sched: Remove stale power aware scheduling remnants > and dysfunctional knobs) removed SD_PERFER_SIBLING on CPU domain > On numa machine, that causes load_balance didn't perfer LCPU in same > physical CPU package. > > It causes some regression on our numa machines from core2 to NHM and SNB. > Recover this domain flag can recover the performance drop. > > This recovery doesn't has any bad impact on my all benchmarks specjbb, > kbuild, fio, hackbench .. etc, on all my machines. > Since it is a recovery, I assume it also has no bad impact for other > platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Thanks!