From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/23 V2] node_states: introduce N_MEMORY
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:01:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343887288-8866-2-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343887288-8866-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
We have N_NORMAL_MEMORY for standing for the nodes that have normal memory with
zone_type <= ZONE_NORMAL.
And we have N_HIGH_MEMORY for standing for the nodes that have normal or high
memory.
But we don't have any word to stand for the nodes that have *any* memory.
And we have N_CPU but without N_MEMORY.
Current code reuse the N_HIGH_MEMORY for this purpose because any node which
has memory must have high memory or normal memory currently.
A) But this reusing is bad for *readability*. Because the name
N_HIGH_MEMORY just stands for high or normal:
A.example 1)
mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages():
for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
The user will be confused(why this function just counts for high or
normal memory node? does it counts for ZONE_MOVABLE's lru pages?)
until someone else tell them N_HIGH_MEMORY is reused to stand for
nodes that have any memory.
A.cont) If we introduce N_MEMORY, we can reduce this confusing
AND make the code more clearly:
A.example 2) mm/page_cgroup.c use N_HIGH_MEMORY twice:
One is in page_cgroup_init(void):
for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
It means if the node have memory, we will allocate page_cgroup map for
the node. We should use N_MEMORY instead here to gaim more clearly.
The second using is in alloc_page_cgroup():
if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
addr = vzalloc_node(size, nid);
It means if the node has high or normal memory that can be allocated
from kernel. We should keep N_HIGH_MEMORY here, and it will be better
if the "any memory" semantic of N_HIGH_MEMORY is removed.
B) This reusing is out-dated if we introduce MOVABLE-dedicated node.
The MOVABLE-dedicated node should not appear in
node_stats[N_HIGH_MEMORY] nor node_stats[N_NORMAL_MEMORY],
because MOVABLE-dedicated node has no high or normal memory.
In x86_64, N_HIGH_MEMORY=N_NORMAL_MEMORY, if a MOVABLE-dedicated node
is in node_stats[N_HIGH_MEMORY], it is also means it is in
node_stats[N_NORMAL_MEMORY], it causes SLUB wrong.
The slub uses
for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
and creates kmem_cache_node for MOVABLE-dedicated node and cause problem.
In one word, we need a N_MEMORY. We just intrude it as an alias to
N_HIGH_MEMORY and fix all im-proper usages of N_HIGH_MEMORY in late patches.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/nodemask.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
index 7afc363..c6ebdc9 100644
--- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
+++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
@@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ enum node_states {
#else
N_HIGH_MEMORY = N_NORMAL_MEMORY,
#endif
+ N_MEMORY = N_HIGH_MEMORY,
N_CPU, /* The node has one or more cpus */
NR_NODE_STATES
};
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-02 6:01 [RFC PATCH 00/23 V2] memory,numa: introduce MOVABLE-dedicated node and online_movable for hotplug Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 02/23 V2] cpuset: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 03/23 V2] procfs: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 04/23 V2] oom: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 05/23 V2] mm,migrate: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 16:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 06/23 V2] mempolicy: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 07/23 V2] memcontrol: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 08/23 V2] hugetlb: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-04 14:02 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 09/23 V2] vmstat: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 16:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 10/23 V2] kthread: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 11/23 V2] init: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 12/23 V2] vmscan: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 13/23 V2] page_alloc: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY change the node_states initialization Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 14/23 V2] slub, hotplug: ignore unrelated node's hot-adding and hot-removing Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 15/23 V2] memory_hotplug: fix missing nodemask management Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 16/23 V2] numa: add CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE for movable-dedicated node Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 17/23 V2] page_alloc.c: don't subtract unrelated memmap from zone's present pages Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 18/23 V2] page_alloc: add kernelcore_max_addr Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 19/23 V2] x86: get pg_data_t's memory from other node Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 20/23 V2] x86: use memblock_set_current_limit() to set memblock.current_limit Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 21/23 V2] memblock: limit memory address from memblock Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 22/23 V2] memblock: compare current_limit with end variable at memblock_find_in_range_node() Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-02 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 23/23 V2] mm, memory-hotplug: add online_movable Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:22 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 00/25] memory,numa: introduce MOVABLE-dedicated node and online_movable for hotplug Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:22 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 01/25] page_alloc.c: don't subtract unrelated memmap from zone's present pages Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:22 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 02/25] memory_hotplug: fix missing nodemask management Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:22 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 03/25] slub, hotplug: ignore unrelated node's hot-adding and hot-removing Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:22 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 04/25] node: cleanup node_state_attr Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:22 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 05/25] node_states: introduce N_MEMORY Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 06/25] cpuset: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 07/25] procfs: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 08/25] memcontrol: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 09/25] oom: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 10/25] mm,migrate: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 11/25] mempolicy: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 12/25] hugetlb: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 13/25] vmstat: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 14/25] kthread: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 15/25] init: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 16/25] vmscan: " Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 17/25] page_alloc: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY change the node_states initialization Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 18/25] hotplug: update nodemasks management Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 19/25] numa: add CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE for movable-dedicated node Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 20/25] page_alloc: add kernelcore_max_addr Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 21/25] x86: get pg_data_t's memory from other node Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 22/25] x86: use memblock_set_current_limit() to set memblock.current_limit Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 23/25] memblock: limit memory address from memblock Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 24/25] memblock: compare current_limit with end variable at memblock_find_in_range_node() Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-06 9:23 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 25/25] mm, memory-hotplug: add online_movable and online_kernel Lai Jiangshan
2012-08-23 8:22 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 00/25] memory,numa: introduce MOVABLE-dedicated node and online_movable for hotplug Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343887288-8866-2-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).