From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757187Ab2HTPsU (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:48:20 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:42814 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751938Ab2HTPsP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:48:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1345477686.23018.62.camel@twins> Subject: Re: lockdep trace from posix timers From: Peter Zijlstra To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , Thomas Gleixner , rostedt , dhowells , Al Viro Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:48:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120820154331.GA20796@redhat.com> References: <20120724203613.GA9637@redhat.com> <1345140478.29668.54.camel@twins> <20120817151447.GA7918@redhat.com> <1345446957.23018.14.camel@twins> <20120820154331.GA20796@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:43 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > BTW, do you think it is really important to try to avoid ->pi_lock? It is for me, I'm doing task_work_add() from under rq->lock.. :/ I could fudge around and delay, but not having to would be nice.