From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] x86, mm: Find early page table only one time
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:06:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346367975-6446-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346367975-6446-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Should not do that in every calling of init_memory_mapping.
Actually in early time, only need do once.
Also move down early_memtest.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/init.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index cca9b7d..c3e4341 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct map_range {
static int page_size_mask;
-static void __init find_early_table_space(struct map_range *mr,
+static void __init find_early_table_space(unsigned long begin,
unsigned long end)
{
unsigned long puds, pmds, ptes, tables, start = 0, good_end = end;
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static void __init find_early_table_space(struct map_range *mr,
extra += PMD_SIZE;
#endif
/* The first 2/4M doesn't use large pages. */
- if (mr->start < PMD_SIZE)
- extra += mr->end - mr->start;
+ if (begin < PMD_SIZE)
+ extra += (PMD_SIZE - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
ptes = (extra + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
} else
@@ -265,15 +265,6 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
nr_range = 0;
nr_range = split_mem_range(mr, nr_range, start, end);
- /*
- * Find space for the kernel direct mapping tables.
- *
- * Later we should allocate these tables in the local node of the
- * memory mapped. Unfortunately this is done currently before the
- * nodes are discovered.
- */
- if (!after_bootmem)
- find_early_table_space(&mr[0], end);
for (i = 0; i < nr_range; i++)
ret = kernel_physical_mapping_init(mr[i].start, mr[i].end,
@@ -287,6 +278,36 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
__flush_tlb_all();
+ return ret >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+}
+
+void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
+{
+ probe_page_size_mask();
+
+ /*
+ * Find space for the kernel direct mapping tables.
+ *
+ * Later we should allocate these tables in the local node of the
+ * memory mapped. Unfortunately this is done currently before the
+ * nodes are discovered.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ find_early_table_space(0, max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
+#else
+ find_early_table_space(0, max_low_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
+#endif
+ max_low_pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping(0, max_low_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
+ max_pfn_mapped = max_low_pfn_mapped;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn) {
+ max_pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping(1UL<<32,
+ max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
+ /* can we preseve max_low_pfn ?*/
+ max_low_pfn = max_pfn;
+ }
+#endif
/*
* Reserve the kernel pagetable pages we used (pgt_buf_start -
* pgt_buf_end) and free the other ones (pgt_buf_end - pgt_buf_top)
@@ -302,32 +323,14 @@ unsigned long __init_refok init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
* RO all the pagetable pages, including the ones that are beyond
* pgt_buf_end at that time.
*/
- if (!after_bootmem && pgt_buf_end > pgt_buf_start)
+ if (pgt_buf_end > pgt_buf_start)
x86_init.mapping.pagetable_reserve(PFN_PHYS(pgt_buf_start),
PFN_PHYS(pgt_buf_end));
- if (!after_bootmem)
- early_memtest(start, end);
-
- return ret >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-}
-
-void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
-{
- probe_page_size_mask();
-
- /* max_pfn_mapped is updated here */
- max_low_pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping(0, max_low_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
- max_pfn_mapped = max_low_pfn_mapped;
+ /* stop the wrong using */
+ pgt_buf_top = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn) {
- max_pfn_mapped = init_memory_mapping(1UL<<32,
- max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT);
- /* can we preseve max_low_pfn ?*/
- max_low_pfn = max_pfn;
- }
-#endif
+ early_memtest(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
}
/*
--
1.7.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-29 19:04 [PATCH V5 0/6] x86: Create direct mappings for E820_RAM only Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86, mm: Add page_size_mask() Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86, mm: Split out split_mem_range Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/mm: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that are being mapped Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 21:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-29 21:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-30 6:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86, mm: init_memory_mapping cleanup Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, mm: Add global page_size_mask Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86, mm: Split out split_mem_range Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, mm: Moving init_memory_mapping calling Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:06 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86: if kernel .text .data .bss are not marked as E820_RAM, complain and fix Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:14 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86, mm: init_memory_mapping cleanup Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 23:22 ` Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 21:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped Jacob Shin
2012-08-29 21:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: if kernel .text .data .bss are not marked as E820_RAM, complain and fix Jacob Shin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346367975-6446-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox