From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] driver core: driver probe asynchronously
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 07:25:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347146720-28596-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (raw)
Hi,
This patchset implements asynchronous driver probe for driver_register,
and try to address the below problems about driver init during
kernel boot:
- help to solve some dependency problem during kernel boot
(such as, request_firmware is called inside probe when driver
is built in kernel[1])
The idea behind the patch is very simple:
- seperate driver probe from driver_register and run this part
in one standalone kernel thread context
- so driver_register will become two parts: register the driver
on the bus, and trigger to schedule a kernel thread to do the
driver probe if autoprobe is set
Fortunately, my OMAP4 based Pandaboard boots fine with the patchset, and
looks it may work well.
More or less, some problems might be triggered by these patchset, but
it should be helpful and not a big deal:
- the dependency problem may be found, and it either exposes
the driver's probelm or help to improve the asynchronous probe
approach
- can use driver_register_sync to work around it
In summary, there are at least two advantages about asynchronous driver
probe:
- speedup kernel boot when many drivers are built in kernel
- make driver's probe() not need to consider running something
asynchronously(such as, scsi scan, request_firmware_no_wait, ...),
so easier to write drivers
It should a very simple way to help to solve the problem[1], without
any changes on current drivers which call request_firmware() in its
probe(). BTW, the patchset doesn't solve the problem completely, and
still some work is needed.
[1], http://marc.info/?t=134676416100002&r=1&w=2
next reply other threads:[~2012-09-08 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-08 23:25 Ming Lei [this message]
2012-09-08 23:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] driver core: driver probe at the last minute in driver_register Ming Lei
2012-09-08 23:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] driver core: introduce driver_register_sync helper Ming Lei
2012-09-08 23:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] driver core: platform: apply driver_register_sync for platform_driver_probe Ming Lei
2012-09-08 23:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] driver core: remove __must_check on declaration of driver_attach Ming Lei
2012-09-08 23:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] driver core: implement asynchorous probe() inside driver_register Ming Lei
2012-09-09 2:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] driver core: driver probe asynchronously Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-09-09 7:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-09-09 7:56 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-09-09 10:44 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347146720-28596-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com \
--to=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox