From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753700Ab2ILRpS (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:45:18 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:57354 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751217Ab2ILRpQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:45:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1347471911.15764.72.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf, intel: Don't touch MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR from NMI context From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Oleg Nesterov , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:45:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1347471446.15764.67.camel@twins> References: <1347466967.15764.63.camel@twins> <1347471446.15764.67.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:37 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Ah, so I do think EIO will re-enable LBR, OK, it does not, but the: > also the handler is wrapped in > x86_pmu::{dis,en}able_all() which does end up calling > intel_pmu_lbr_{dis,en}able_all(). Thing does the re-enable for us, > However that leaves the MSR in the > exact same state on exit as it was on enter, so that's not a problem for > the: read-modify-write change. in a safe way.