From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932120Ab2IMMSB (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:18:01 -0400 Received: from [205.233.59.134] ([205.233.59.134]:53923 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932099Ab2IMMR7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:17:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1347538571.15764.133.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf: use hrtimer for event multiplexing From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: LKML , "mingo@elte.hu" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , "Yan, Zheng" , Robert Richter Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:16:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1347459195-5491-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <1347459195-5491-3-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <1347459764.15764.32.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 17:37 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > Note however that the rotation_list is still used in perf_event_task_tick() > to iterate over the ctx which needs unthrottling. We would have to switch > that loop over to a for-each-pmu() which would necessary incur more > iterations as it would include all the SW PMUs. Oh urgh, right. I think that was one of the reasons I bailed on the hrtimer thing, the frequency and throttle stuff. ctx->nr_freq and needs_unthr could help, but yeah.