From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:23:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348626206.7100.166.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925184245.GA13694@liondog.tnic>
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 20:42 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Right, so why did we need it all, in the first place? There has to be
> some reason for it.
Easy. Take two communicating tasks. Is an affine wakeup a good idea?
It depends on how much execution overlap there is. Wake affine when
there is overlap larger than cache miss cost, and you just tossed
throughput into the bin.
select_idle_sibling() was originally about shared L2, where any overlap
was salvageable. On modern processors with no shared L2, you have to
get past the cost, but the gain is still there. Intel wins with loads
that AMD loses very bady on, so I can only guess that Intel must feed
caches more efficiently. Dunno. It just doesn't matter though, point
is that there is a win to be had in both cases, the breakeven just isn't
at the same point.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-26 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-14 7:47 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets Nikolay Ulyanitsky
2012-09-14 18:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 18:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:27 ` 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-14 21:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-14 21:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-14 21:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-15 3:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-14 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-14 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-14 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-14 22:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-14 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-15 3:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 16:16 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-15 16:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 17:08 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-09-16 4:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 21:32 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-16 4:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-16 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-17 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-17 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-17 10:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-17 14:39 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-19 12:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-19 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-19 15:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-24 15:00 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 15:23 ` Nikolay Ulyanitsky
2012-09-24 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 15:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-24 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-25 12:10 ` Hillf Danton
2012-09-24 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 16:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-25 13:23 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-24 18:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-24 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-24 19:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 1:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 2:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 2:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 3:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 3:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 3:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 3:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-25 13:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 17:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-25 18:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-26 2:23 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2012-09-26 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-26 2:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-26 2:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-26 2:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-26 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-26 16:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-26 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-26 21:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 5:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 5:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 5:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 5:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 5:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 6:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 6:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-09-27 16:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-27 18:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-27 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 19:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-28 3:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-28 12:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-28 4:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-28 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 7:17 ` david
2012-09-27 7:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 10:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-27 13:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 16:55 ` david
2012-09-27 4:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-27 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 16:48 ` david
2012-09-27 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 17:45 ` david
2012-09-27 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-27 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-27 18:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-25 1:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-25 21:11 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-09-25 4:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 4:11 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <CA+55aFz1A7HbMYS9o-GTS5Zm=Xx8MUD7cR05GMVo--2E34jcgQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-15 4:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 10:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-15 14:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 15:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-15 16:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-15 19:44 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348626206.7100.166.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lystor@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox