From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eranian@google.com,
acme@redhat.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/31] perf, x86: Add PEBSv2 record support
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:31:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348806696-31170-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348806696-31170-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Add support for the v2 PEBS format. It has a superset of the v1 PEBS
fields, but has a longer record so we need to adjust the code paths.
The main advantage is the new "EventingRip" support which directly
gives the instruction, not off-by-one instruction. So with precise == 2
we use that directly and don't try to use LBRs and walking basic blocks.
This lowers the overhead significantly.
Some other features are added in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 915b876..87c2ab0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
* check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
* whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
*/
- if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1) {
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index e38d97b..c8ab670 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ struct pebs_record_nhm {
u64 status, dla, dse, lat;
};
+struct pebs_record_v2 {
+ struct pebs_record_nhm nhm;
+ u64 eventingrip;
+ u64 tsx_tuning;
+};
+
void init_debug_store_on_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct debug_store *ds = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu).ds;
@@ -545,8 +551,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
{
/*
* We cast to pebs_record_core since that is a subset of
- * both formats and we don't use the other fields in this
- * routine.
+ * both formats.
*/
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct pebs_record_core *pebs = __pebs;
@@ -574,7 +579,10 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
regs.bp = pebs->bp;
regs.sp = pebs->sp;
- if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(®s))
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 2) {
+ regs.ip = ((struct pebs_record_v2 *)pebs)->eventingrip;
+ regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
+ } else if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(®s))
regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
else
regs.flags &= ~PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
@@ -627,35 +635,21 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs)
__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, at);
}
-static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_common(struct pt_regs *iregs, void *at,
+ void *top)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
- struct pebs_record_nhm *at, *top;
struct perf_event *event = NULL;
u64 status = 0;
- int bit, n;
-
- if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
- return;
-
- at = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
- top = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
+ int bit;
ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
- n = top - at;
- if (n <= 0)
- return;
+ for ( ; at < top; at += x86_pmu.pebs_record_size) {
+ struct pebs_record_nhm *p = at;
- /*
- * Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
- * set a reset value.
- */
- WARN_ONCE(n > x86_pmu.max_pebs_events, "Unexpected number of pebs records %d\n", n);
-
- for ( ; at < top; at++) {
- for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&at->status, x86_pmu.max_pebs_events) {
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&p->status, x86_pmu.max_pebs_events) {
event = cpuc->events[bit];
if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
continue;
@@ -678,6 +672,61 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
}
}
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
+{
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
+ struct pebs_record_nhm *at, *top;
+ int n;
+
+ if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
+ return;
+
+ at = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
+ top = (struct pebs_record_nhm *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
+
+ ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
+
+ n = top - at;
+ if (n <= 0)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
+ * set a reset value.
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(n > x86_pmu.max_pebs_events,
+ "Unexpected number of pebs records %d\n", n);
+
+ return intel_pmu_drain_pebs_common(iregs, at, top);
+}
+
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_v2(struct pt_regs *iregs)
+{
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
+ struct pebs_record_v2 *at, *top;
+ int n;
+
+ if (!x86_pmu.pebs_active)
+ return;
+
+ at = (struct pebs_record_v2 *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_buffer_base;
+ top = (struct pebs_record_v2 *)(unsigned long)ds->pebs_index;
+
+ n = top - at;
+ if (n <= 0)
+ return;
+ /*
+ * Should not happen, we program the threshold at 1 and do not
+ * set a reset value.
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(n > x86_pmu.max_pebs_events,
+ "Unexpected number of pebs records %d\n", n);
+
+ return intel_pmu_drain_pebs_common(iregs, at, top);
+}
+
/*
* BTS, PEBS probe and setup
*/
@@ -709,6 +758,12 @@ void intel_ds_init(void)
x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm;
break;
+ case 2:
+ printk(KERN_CONT "PEBS fmt2%c, ", pebs_type);
+ x86_pmu.pebs_record_size = sizeof(struct pebs_record_v2);
+ x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_pebs_v2;
+ break;
+
default:
printk(KERN_CONT "no PEBS fmt%d%c, ", format, pebs_type);
x86_pmu.pebs = 0;
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-28 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-28 4:31 perf PMU support for Haswell Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2012-09-28 8:43 ` [PATCH 01/31] perf, x86: Add PEBSv2 record support Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 8:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-09-28 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 11:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-09-28 14:42 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 02/31] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PMU support Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 14:58 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <CABPqkBQ90Crh+EpRQq0Y+xUvrj5vzrX_=SpJQyR4p8uFR_Hr=Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-28 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 15:23 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 03/31] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PEBS support Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 04/31] perf, core: Add generic intx/intx_checkpointed counter modifiers Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 11:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-09-28 14:53 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 15:29 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 15:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 05/31] perf, tools: Add :c,:t event modifiers in perf tools Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 06/31] perf, tools: Add intx/intx_checkpoint to perf script and header printing Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 07/31] perf, x86: Implement the :t and :c qualifiers for Haswell Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 08/31] perf, x86: Report PEBS event in a raw format Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 8:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 09/31] perf, kvm: Support :t and :c perf modifiers in KVM arch perfmon emulation Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 10/31] perf, x86: Support PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR on Haswell Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 11/31] perf, x86: Support Haswell v4 LBR format Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 12/31] perf, x86: Disable LBR recording for unknown LBR_FMT Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 13/31] perf, x86: Support LBR filtering by INTX/NOTX/ABORT Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 14/31] perf, tools: Add abort,notx,intx branch filter options to perf report -j Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 15/31] perf, tools: Support sorting by intx, abort branch flags Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 16/31] perf, x86: Support full width counting on Haswell Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 17/31] perf, x86: Avoid checkpointed counters causing excessive TSX aborts Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 18/31] perf, core: Add a concept of a weightened sample Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 9:06 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-09-28 14:57 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 17:09 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 19/31] perf, x86: Support weight samples for PEBS Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 20/31] perf, tools: Add support for weight Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 21/31] perf, tools: Handle XBEGIN like a jump Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 22/31] perf, core: Define generic hardware transaction events Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 23/31] perf, tools: Add support for generic transaction events to perf userspace Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 24/31] perf, x86: Add the Haswell implementation of the generic transaction events Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 25/31] perf, tools: Add perf stat --transaction Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 26/31] perf, x86: Support for printing PMU state on spurious PMIs Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-28 11:39 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 27/31] perf, core: Add generic transaction flags Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 28/31] perf, x86: Add Haswell specific transaction flag reporting Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 29/31] perf, tools: Add support for record transaction flags Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 30/31] perf, tools: Point --sort documentation to --help Andi Kleen
2012-09-28 4:31 ` [PATCH 31/31] perf, tools: Add browser support for transaction flags Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-02 23:48 perf PMU support for Haswell v2 Andi Kleen
2012-10-02 23:48 ` [PATCH 01/31] perf, x86: Add PEBSv2 record support Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348806696-31170-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).