From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757250Ab2I1Jg3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:36:29 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:57434 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754836Ab2I1Jg2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:36:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1348824980.3292.68.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/31] perf, x86: Support for printing PMU state on spurious PMIs From: Peter Zijlstra To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, acme@redhat.com, Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:36:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1348806696-31170-27-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> References: <1348806696-31170-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1348806696-31170-27-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 21:31 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > +static bool print_spurious_pmi __read_mostly; > +module_param(print_spurious_pmi, bool, 0644); Shouldn't this be a per-pmu sysfs attr?