From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751920Ab2I2WKW (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:10:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:48568 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751773Ab2I2WKU (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:10:20 -0400 Message-ID: <1348956616.7401.2.camel@maxim-laptop> Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] memstick: memory leak on error in msb_ftl_scan() From: Maxim Levitsky To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:10:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120929071138.GC10993@elgon.mountain> References: <20120929071138.GC10993@elgon.mountain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 10:11 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We need to free "overwrite_flags" before returning. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c > index a8e8915..1f9d5cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c > +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c > @@ -1408,8 +1408,10 @@ static int msb_ftl_scan(struct msb_data *msb) > msb_mark_block_used(msb, pba); > msb_erase_block(msb, pba); > continue; > - } else if (error) > + } else if (error) { > + kfree(overwrite_flags); > return error; > + } > > lba = be16_to_cpu(extra.logical_address); > managment_flag = extra.management_flag; Indeed. I need to be more careful with this, I'll do another review of the code, maybe I spot anything else. Acked-by: Maxim Levitsky Best regards, Maxim Levitsky