From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756610Ab2JQLCI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:02:08 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:44590 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756205Ab2JQLCG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:02:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1350471723.1242.67.camel@hornet> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: vexpress: Add missing n_voltages setting From: Pawel Moll To: Axel Lin Cc: Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:02:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1350444418.4562.1.camel@phoenix> References: <1350444418.4562.1.camel@phoenix> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2012 11:02:03.0397 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6C45B50:01CDAC56] X-MC-Unique: 112101712020404801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 04:26 +0100, Axel Lin wrote: > I don't have a chance to compile test this patch because I could not > find VEXPRESS_CONFIG in current tree. > Can you help testing this patch? I'll be more than happy to help, but can you please tell me what use case you have in mind? The "reg->desc.continuous_voltage_range = true;" together with this patch: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd7a2b600ace90c8819495b639a744c8f5c68feb were supposed to make the n_voltages unnecessary, as this regulator is (in theory at least) capable of setting any voltage in the constraints range, so there are not real operating points. Cheers! Paweł