From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755122Ab2JWVxl (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:53:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:42670 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754237Ab2JWVxj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:53:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] posix timers: allocate timer id per process From: Eric Dumazet To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@parallels.com In-Reply-To: References: <20121023073913.23514.87934.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1350978723.8609.1555.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:53:36 +0200 Message-ID: <1351029216.6537.3.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 23:47 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Not so good to me. > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet > > And that should be either an Acked-by or a Reviewed-by. You can't sign > off on patches which have not been submitted or transported by you. I actually gave some input, provided a hash function, and so on. So this SOB was valid. I do that all the time. And yes, there are bugs in this patch, as many patches that were merged in linux tree, included by you. Thanks