From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:01:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:01:27 -0400 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:45806 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 11:01:26 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <15603.38007.42661.75173@kim.it.uu.se> To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: "J.A. Magallon" , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Miles Bader , Keith Owens , Lista Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PentiumPro/II split in x86 config Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:00:57 +0100 Message-ID: <13519.1022598057@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mikpe@csd.uu.se said: > They do implement inline asm() nowadays, but alas not &&label and > computed gotos. The only places I've seen &&label used are where it's been passed into an inline asm which has jumped to it... but gcc has optimised the label and the code following it away because it was never used (inline asm isn't allowed to do that). -- dwmw2