From: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>, David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] kernelshark: Fix bug with Plot CPU filtering
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:48:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352944088-21333-1-git-send-email-dhsharp@google.com> (raw)
From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Plot CPU filtering in kernelshark has the following bug:
1) Deselect CPU A from Plot CPU list
2) Plot gets updated with no CPU A
3) Deselect CPU B
4) Plot continues to have CPU B
This is due to a bug in graph_plot_cpus_update_callback(),
which seems to be checking old_all_cpus != new_all_cpus before doing any
update. This condition is true on 1, but false on 2.
Removing that check fixes the problem.
Tested:
Above sequence now does expected filtering.
Google-bug-id: 4258610
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
---
trace-plot-cpu.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/trace-plot-cpu.c b/trace-plot-cpu.c
index 630d6c2..bb767d3 100644
--- a/trace-plot-cpu.c
+++ b/trace-plot-cpu.c
@@ -498,9 +498,8 @@ void graph_plot_cpus_update_callback(gboolean accept,
/* Get the current status */
graph_plot_cpus_plotted(ginfo, &old_all_cpus, &old_cpu_mask);
- if (old_all_cpus == all_cpus ||
- (selected_cpu_mask &&
- cpus_equal(old_cpu_mask, selected_cpu_mask, ginfo->cpus))) {
+ if (selected_cpu_mask &&
+ cpus_equal(old_cpu_mask, selected_cpu_mask, ginfo->cpus)) {
/* Nothing to do */
g_free(old_cpu_mask);
return;
--
1.7.7.3
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 1:48 David Sharp [this message]
2012-11-15 1:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] kernel-shark: Allow unsetting of all CPUs in filter David Sharp
2012-11-15 1:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] kernel-shark: Don't check for system name for sched events David Sharp
2012-11-15 1:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] kernelshark: Full-height cursor and mark lines David Sharp
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-15 1:51 [PATCH 1/4] kernelshark: Fix bug with Plot CPU filtering David Sharp
2012-11-15 1:52 ` David Sharp
2012-11-15 2:31 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352944088-21333-1-git-send-email-dhsharp@google.com \
--to=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.net \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).