linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>, David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] kernelshark: Fix bug with Plot CPU filtering
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:48:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352944088-21333-1-git-send-email-dhsharp@google.com> (raw)

From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>

Plot CPU filtering in kernelshark has the following bug:
1) Deselect CPU A from Plot CPU list
2) Plot gets updated with no CPU A
3) Deselect CPU B
4) Plot continues to have CPU B

This is due to a bug in graph_plot_cpus_update_callback(),
which seems to be checking old_all_cpus != new_all_cpus before doing any
update. This condition is true on 1, but false on 2.
Removing that check fixes the problem.

Tested:
Above sequence now does expected filtering.

Google-bug-id: 4258610
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>
---
 trace-plot-cpu.c |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/trace-plot-cpu.c b/trace-plot-cpu.c
index 630d6c2..bb767d3 100644
--- a/trace-plot-cpu.c
+++ b/trace-plot-cpu.c
@@ -498,9 +498,8 @@ void graph_plot_cpus_update_callback(gboolean accept,
 	/* Get the current status */
 	graph_plot_cpus_plotted(ginfo, &old_all_cpus, &old_cpu_mask);
 
-	if (old_all_cpus == all_cpus ||
-	    (selected_cpu_mask &&
-	     cpus_equal(old_cpu_mask, selected_cpu_mask, ginfo->cpus))) {
+	if (selected_cpu_mask &&
+	     cpus_equal(old_cpu_mask, selected_cpu_mask, ginfo->cpus)) {
 		/* Nothing to do */
 		g_free(old_cpu_mask);
 		return;
-- 
1.7.7.3


             reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15  1:48 David Sharp [this message]
2012-11-15  1:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] kernel-shark: Allow unsetting of all CPUs in filter David Sharp
2012-11-15  1:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] kernel-shark: Don't check for system name for sched events David Sharp
2012-11-15  1:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] kernelshark: Full-height cursor and mark lines David Sharp
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-15  1:51 [PATCH 1/4] kernelshark: Fix bug with Plot CPU filtering David Sharp
2012-11-15  1:52 ` David Sharp
2012-11-15  2:31   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1352944088-21333-1-git-send-email-dhsharp@google.com \
    --to=dhsharp@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.net \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).