From: "Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez" <siglesias@igalia.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
jens.taprogge@taprogge.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipack: move header files to include/linux
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:14:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353089655.4563.56.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353089331.2512.2.camel@joe-AO722>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 10:08 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 18:34 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > Move ipack header files to include/linux/ directory where they belong to.
>
> Why do these belong in include/linux?
They are used for other drivers that could be in other directories.
> What's wrong with path relative includes?
There is nothing wrong with relative includes. It's just to do the
things as other subsystems do: keeping the bus' header file in
include/linux directory.
Is this approach wrong for this case?
Sam
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-16 17:34 [PATCH] ipack: move header files to include/linux Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez
2012-11-16 17:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 17:48 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-11-16 17:53 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
2012-11-16 18:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 18:08 ` Joe Perches
2012-11-16 18:14 ` Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez [this message]
2012-11-16 19:01 ` Joe Perches
2012-11-16 19:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353089655.4563.56.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com \
--to=siglesias@igalia.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jens.taprogge@taprogge.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox