public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexander Shiyan" <shc_work@mail.ru>
To: "Anton Vorontsov" <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	"Russell King" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	patches@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"Jason Wessel" <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH 10/10] ARM: FIQ: Get rid of init_FIQ()
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:36:01 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353656161.911816605@f287.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121123065002.GB27827@lizard>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 2828 bytes --]

> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:27:51AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 07:40:30AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > >  static unsigned long no_fiq_insn;
> > > > > +static int got_no_fiq_insn;
> > > > > @@ -78,11 +79,14 @@ void show_fiq_list(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
> > > > >  
> > > > >  void set_fiq_handler(void *start, unsigned int length)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS)
> > > > > -	memcpy((void *)0xffff001c, start, length);
> > > > > -#else
> > > > > -	memcpy(vectors_page + 0x1c, start, length);
> > > > > +	unsigned long *addr = (void *)0xffff001c;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS
> > > > > +	addr = vectors_page + 0x1c;
> > > > >  #endif
> > > > > +	if (!cmpxchg(&got_no_fiq_insn, 0, 1))
> > > > > +		no_fiq_insn = *addr;
> > > > > +	memcpy(addr, start, length);
> > > > >  	flush_icache_range(0xffff001c, 0xffff001c + length);
> > > > >  	if (!vectors_high())
> > > > >  		flush_icache_range(0x1c, 0x1c + length);
> > > > > @@ -126,8 +130,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_fiq_regs);	/* defined in fiqasm.S */
> > > > > -
> > > > > -void __init init_FIQ(void)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > -	no_fiq_insn = *(unsigned long *)0xffff001c;
> > > > 
> > > > it seems that this is wrong. In this case we have an uninitialized variable and
> > > > sequential call claim_fiq and release_fiq could be fatal. FIXME please.
> > > 
> > > Um... I don't think I understand, can you please elaborate?
> > 
> > OK, I'll try to explain it.
> > At the end of the release_fiq function we have a call fiq_op. For the default
> > handler - is a fiq_def_op function, and we call this function with the option
> > "relinquish = 0", i.e. we want to restore old fiq_handler. But if we do not call
> > set_fiq_handler never before, we will have an uninitialized no_fiq_insn variable.
> 
> It should not matter when or in what order anyone calls the
> set_fiq_handler(), since it stores "no FIQ instruction" into no_fiq_insn
> at its first invocation:
> 
> 	if (!cmpxchg(&got_no_fiq_insn, 0, 1))
> 		no_fiq_insn = *addr;
> 
> If we never called set_fiq_handler() before, during release_fiq() we'll:
> 
> 1. Copy the initial instruction from the vector page to 'no_fiq_insn';
> 2. Copy the initial instruction from 'no_fiq_insn' to the vector page;
> 
> So no_fiq_insn gets initialized, then we just instantly write the same
> value back.

got_no_fiq_insn also not initialized.
I think as a whole on this issue requires additional comments from Russell
as the author of implementation.

PS: In any case, I can reproduce it and check it out if you send me a patchset
to my email as an attachment.


---
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-23  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-23  0:38 [PATCH resend 0/10] Get rid of FIQ_START/enable/disable_fiq() + some FIQ cleanups Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] ARM: mach-rpc: Don't register FIQs with genirq Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] ARM: plat-s3c24xx: Don't use FIQ_START Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] [media] mx1_camera: Don't use {en,dis}able_fiq() calls Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] ASoC: imx: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] ARM: FIQ: Remove enable_fiq() and disable_fiq() calls Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] ARM: FIQ: Remove FIQ_START Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 07/10] ARM: FIQ: Should include asm/mach/irq.h Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 08/10] ARM: FIQ: Implement !CONFIG_FIQ stubs Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] ARM: FIQ: Make show_fiq_list() return void Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: FIQ: Get rid of init_FIQ() Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  3:40   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-11-23  5:53     ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  6:27       ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2012-11-23  6:50         ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-23  7:36           ` Alexander Shiyan [this message]
2012-11-23  7:51             ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-11-27  9:05               ` Anton Vorontsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1353656161.911816605@f287.mail.ru \
    --to=shc_work@mail.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox