[PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask

[Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>]

During the development of this driver an in-house register
documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests
were done and this problem was found. It turned out that
the released register documentation is wrong.

The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.

Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
index c464682..676e729 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
@@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "led_1",
 		.port = 0x49,
-		.mask = BIT(7),
+		.mask = BIT(6),
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "led_2",
 		.port = 0x49,
-		.mask = BIT(6),
+		.mask = BIT(5),
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "led_3",
 		.port = 0x49,
-		.mask = BIT(5),
+		.mask = BIT(4),
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "led_4",
 		.port = 0x49,
-		.mask = BIT(4),
+		.mask = BIT(3),
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "led_5",
 		.port = 0x49,
-		.mask = BIT(3),
+		.mask = BIT(2),
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "led_6",
 		.port = 0x49,
-		.mask = BIT(2),
+		.mask = BIT(1),
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "led_7",
 		.port = 0x49,
-		.mask = BIT(1),
+		.mask = BIT(0),
 	}
 };
 
-- 
1.7.10.4