From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753893Ab2LKOIv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:08:51 -0500 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:56533 "EHLO e9.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753632Ab2LKOIr (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:08:47 -0500 Message-ID: <1355234914.2356.85.camel@falcor> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ima: policy search speedup From: Mimi Zohar To: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , James Morris Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:08:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12121114-7182-0000-0000-000003B25383 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:51 +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote: > >> Here is two patches for policy search speedup. > >> > >> First patch adds additional features flags to superblock. > >> Second - implementation for IMA. > >> > >> Two months ago I was asking about it on mailing lists. > >> Suggestion was not to use s_flags, but e.g. s_feature_flags. > >> > >> Any objections about such approach? First of all my appologies for not responding earlier. Based on the previous discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/19/9, this looks like the right direction. Specific comments will be posted on the individual patches. thanks, Mimi