From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754919Ab2LKV6z (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59566 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753531Ab2LKV6x (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1355263123.3527.27.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: linux-next: recent rebases From: Eric Paris To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Jaegeuk Kim , Marek Szyprowski , Kyungmin Park , Kees Cook Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121212084108.de14154ec0e365453617bfd7@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20121212084108.de14154ec0e365453617bfd7@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:41 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > I am not sure how much you care about this, but here is a list of the > trees in linux-next that have been rebased in the last day (i.e. since I > fetched the trees for next-20121211): > > fsnotify: rebased to v3.6(!) to resolve a conflict. > git://git.infradead.org/users/eparis/notify.git#for-next I planned to let it sit in -next until at least next thursday before I sent a pull request. Thought that fit within the rules...