linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC 0/3] perf tests: Adding precise event attribute test
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355929642-28392-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> (raw)

hi,
as per issues with precise attribute [1], adding simple test to
catch it next time. 

Patch 2 adds sysfs 'precise' attribute containing maximum value
for perf_event_attr::precise_ip.

Patch 3 adds simple test checking the attribute and creating cycle
events with all possible precise values.

I based this on revert (Patch 1) discussed in [1]. I'm not sure
this revert will tak place at the end, but I wanted to get some
feedback on the 'precise' attribute first.

Attached patches:
  1/3 Revert "perf: Require exclude_guest to use PEBS - kernel side enforcement"
  2/3 perf x86: Add precise sysfs attribute
  3/3 perf tests: Add precise event attribute test

thanks,
jirka

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135536724805356&w=2

Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 tools/perf/Makefile              |  1 +
 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c  |  4 ++++
 tools/perf/tests/precise.c       | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/tests/tests.h         |  1 +
 5 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

             reply	other threads:[~2012-12-19 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-19 15:07 Jiri Olsa [this message]
2012-12-19 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "perf: Require exclude_guest to use PEBS - kernel side enforcement" Jiri Olsa
2012-12-22 19:21   ` David Ahern
2012-12-24 14:03     ` Jiri Olsa
2012-12-19 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf x86: Add precise sysfs attribute Jiri Olsa
2012-12-20  5:34   ` Greg KH
2012-12-20 10:27     ` Jiri Olsa
2012-12-20  8:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-20 11:19     ` Jiri Olsa
2012-12-19 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf tests: Add precise event attribute test Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1355929642-28392-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).